1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedaia [141]
2 years ago
5

50 points + brainly

Business
1 answer:
Sergeeva-Olga [200]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Probably Bad.

Explanation:

It would be very hard to do..pretty much anything without the internet. I cant search up anything that might help me with something.

You might be interested in
What organization design aspects of Zara make it so succuccessful ?
Kamila [148]

Answer:

The secret to Zara’s success has largely being driven by its ability to keep up with rapidly changing fashion trends and showcase it in its collections with very little delay. From the very beginning, Zara found a significant gap in the market that few clothing brands had effectively addressed. This was to keep pace with latest fashion trends, but offer clothing collections that are a combination of high quality and yet, are affordable. The brand keeps a close watch on how fashion is changing and evolving every day across the world. Based on latest styles and trends, it creates new designs and puts them into stores in a week or two. In stark comparison, most other fashion brands would take close to six months to get new designs and collections into the market.

It is through this strategic ability of introducing new collections based on latest trends in a rapid manner that enabled Zara to beat other competitors. It quickly became the people’s favourite brand, especially with those who want to keep up with fashion trends. Founder Amancio Ortega is famously known for his views on clothes as a perishable commodity. According to him, people should love to use and wear clothes for a short while and then they should throw them away, just like yogurt, bread or fish, rather than store them in cupboards.

The media often quotes that the brand produces “freshly baked clothes”, which survive fashion trends for less than a month or two. Zara concentrates on three areas to effectively “bake” its fresh fashions:

Shorter lead times (and more fashionable clothes): Shorter lead times allow Zara to ensure that its stores stock clothes that customers want at that time (e.g. specific spring/ summer or autumn/ winter collections, recent trend that is catching up, sudden popularity of an item worn by a celebrity/ socialite/ actor/ actress, latest collection of a top designer etc.). While many retailers try to forecast what customers might buy months in the future, Zara moves in step with its customers and offers them what they want to buy at a given point in time.

Lower quantities (through scarce supply): By reducing the quantity manufactured for a particular style, Zara not only reduces its exposure to any single product but also creates artificial scarcity. Similar to the principle that applies to all fashion items (and more specifically luxury), the lesser the availability, the more desirable an object becomes. Another benefit of producing lower quantities is that if a style does not generate traction and suffers from poor sales, there is not a high volume to be disposed of. Zara only has two time-bound sales a year rather than constant markdowns, and it discounts a very small proportion of its products, approximately half compared to its competitors, which is a very impressive feat.

More styles: Rather than producing more quantities per style, Zara produces more styles, roughly 12,000 a year. Even if a style sells out very quickly, there are new styles waiting to take up the space. This means more choices and higher chance of getting it right with the consumer.

Zara only allows its designs to remain on the shop floor for three to four weeks. This practice pushes consumers to keep visiting the brand’s stores because if they were just a week late, all the clothes of a particular style or trend would be gone and replaced with a new trend. At the same time, this constant refreshing of the lines and styles carried by its stores also entices customers to visit its shops more frequently.

In the following sections, the key components of Zara’s winning formula in the fashion retailing industry are illustrated.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Match the definitions to the relevant economic indicators.
Monica [59]
Fluctuation in economic activity
4 0
3 years ago
At the beginning of the year, Horvath Company estimated the following: Overhead $270,000 Direct labor hours 90,000 Horvath uses
levacccp [35]

Answer:

overhead rate: $3 per labor hours

Appled overhead for January 25,050 dollars

Applied overhead: 268,800 dollar underapplied by 7,200 dollars

Explanation:

\frac{Cost\: Of \:Manufacturing \:Overhead}{Cost \:Driver}= Overhead \:Rate

expected overhead: 270,000

cost driver: labor hours.

expected labor hours: 90,000

overhead rate: 270,000 / 90,000 = 3

<u>Applied overhead for January</u>

8,350 labor hours x $3 overhead rate = 25,050

for the year:

89,600 x $ 3 =    268,800

actual overhead 276,000

Difference:             7,200

As the actual cost were higher; the overhead was underapplicated.

we need to capitalize more cost.

6 0
3 years ago
A financial analyst learns that the Bank of England has just issued a new bond that promises to pay £1,000 in one year’s time wh
Ilya [14]

Answer:

the price will go lower and I know how much it would be

6 0
3 years ago
Suppose a tax of $1 per unit is imposed on a good. The more elastic the supply of the good, other things equal, the.
zimovet [89]

Suppose a tax of $1 per unit is imposed on a good. The more elastic the supply of the good, other things equal, the the larger is the deadweight loss of the tax.

<h3>What Is a deadweight loss of taxation? </h3>

The measurement of loss brought on by the introduction of a new tax is referred to as the deadweight loss of taxation. This is the outcome of a new tax that is higher than what is typically paid to the taxing body of the government. A tax's impact on consumer surplus is known as "deadweight loss."

The amount of money the government makes when a tax is imposed on a good is exactly equal to the surplus that the tax causes to be lost by consumers and producers. A deadweight loss occurs when supply and demand are out of balance, leading to market inefficiencies. Deadweight losses are generally caused by an inefficient resource allocation that is brought about by a variety of interventions, including price floors, ceilings, monopolies, and taxes.

To learn more about deadweight loss of the tax, visit:

brainly.com/question/22420162

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Suppose a tax of $1 per unit is imposed on a good. The more elastic the supply of the good, other things equal:

a. the smaller is the response of quantity supplied to the tax.

b. the larger is the tax burden on sellers relative to the tax burden on buyers.

c. the larger is the deadweight loss of the tax.

d. All of the above are correct

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The functional manager is planning the billing system replacement project with the newest project manager at the company. In dis
    8·1 answer
  • Recently, the acme explosives company was sold to a new owner, roadrunner inc. the operations of the two organizations are going
    7·1 answer
  • Considerable research has documented that in many product categories, consumers are unable to distinguish among brands when give
    7·1 answer
  • The listing and selling brokers agree to split a 7% commission fifty-fifty on a $96,900 lot sale. The listing broker is on a 30%
    6·1 answer
  • Shen is interning to become a nurse. Mila is a very skilled and helpful nurse, but also very busy. Shen was glad to have the cha
    9·1 answer
  • Who or what determines a country's GDP?
    14·2 answers
  • Franchise<br> Is what type of organization
    7·2 answers
  • CBA Company reported total stockholders' equity of $76,000 on its balance sheet dated December 31, 2018. During the year ended D
    11·1 answer
  • Logan, a 50% shareholder in Military Gear Incorporated (MG), is comparing the tax consequences of losses from C corporations wit
    9·1 answer
  • Marlene has been living in her $120,000 home for 31 years. Because she has paid off the mortgage, she decides to save some money
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!