If the statement above asks if it is true or false, the answer would be true. It is because when there is a presence of shortage, they will put a high price, in order for the demand, in which those consumers who could afford it and want it, bought it, making the demand lower for the ones who could only take the product that had set in a high price would be the consumers who could afford them. It could also be called a marketing technique in order for the producers to sell their product.
Amiable is thee answer due to the fact it starts with an A and ends with an E, thus making le answer Amiable. Good day sir/ma'am and drink some fluids for the effect of making yourself well. (hope the 1700-1800 speech made you smile)
:) - random person
In Simons and Chabris’s (1999) experiment, participants are focused on a challengingperceptual task, counting the white team’s basketball passes while ignoring the black team’s basketball passes. Because of the challenging nature of the task:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
B. Attentional capture of irrelevant stimuli is more likely to occur
C. Attention shift capacity is less likely to occur
D. The spotlight model of attention is needed to explain the data
Answer:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
Explanation:
Inattentional blindness often referred to as Perceptual blindness is a term in psychology which describes the failure of an individual or observer to notice or perceive a fully visible but unexpected object, due to the attention being given or channeled to another task at that moment.
This is a phenomenon that was first coined by Irvin Rock and Arien Mack, in 1992, both are psychologists.
The most common experiments demonstrating inattentional blindness is the "invisible gorilla test" carried out by Christopher Chabris, Ph.D. and Daniel Simons, Ph.D.
OK so there can be a few answers to this depending on what office political party, political staff that helps form a plan the ensure victory
Answer:
It is impossible. There is a straight line-- no in between.
Explanation:
