Among all the statements, the statement which would most likely be made by an opponent of affirmative action or positive action is that each person (regardless of caste, region, sex and colour) should be judged as an individual without taking anyone else into consideration.
The laws and policies supporting Affirmative Action seek to find ways to bring equality and opportunities, with the intention of correcting any disadvantage that people had in the past.
If someone doesn't agree with this initiative, they might consider that all should be evaluated without taking such measures of compensation.
After getting a slight burn from the spark of a flickering campfire, julie became afraid of getting close to lighted gas stoves. this best illustrates the survival value of <u>generalization.</u>
<u></u>
A generalization is a form of abstraction wherein common properties of particular instances are formulated as wellknown concepts or claims. Generalizations posit the existence of a website or set of elements, as well as one or greater common characteristics shared with the aid of those factors.
While you make an announcement approximately all or the majority or matters collectively, you're making a generalization. As an instance: – All birds have wings. – Many kids eat cereal for breakfast.
Learn more about generalization here: brainly.com/question/26238937
#SPJ4
Answer:
General is the term utilized for thoughts or ideas. Specific is for the most part utilized for articles or individual things that we experience on the planet.
Explanation:
The 'General' term incorporate words like blue, red, book, or auto. Plato contended that reality comprises of the Forms (the irrelevant embodiment of the articles that exist in a different reality) and that the structures exist in a different domain.
4 points as to nature of universals and particulars seem to be:
1. Extreme authenticity is the view that Forms (or universals) exist in a different domain and that articles in this reality duplicate the irrelevant Forms.
2. Exaggerated authenticity holds that universals exist in particulars as a major aspect of what makes them comparative. Thoughts exist in the physical items, for example, our psyches, and not in a different reality.
3. The following perspective would be called conceptualism. Conceptualism asserts that thoughts are genuine, yet they rely on what you think or musings. The capacity of a general term is to signify an exceptional connection between specific articles. Universals or structures are protest ideas that we make in our brains by inspecting particulars.
4. The last view is called outrageous nominalism. Extraordinary nominalism asserts that universals or structures don't exist. In this view, thoughts are not genuine articles. Universals or structures don't have any presence, just particulars or individual items exist.
The most a person (age 21 or older) can be fined for a first conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor with no death or injury involved is $2000.
<h3><u>
What is intoxicating liquor?</u></h3>
- The term "intoxicating liquor" refers to all alcoholic beverages, including fermented malt beverages, that have less than 5% alcohol by weight, whether they are distilled, ardent, spiritous, or vinous, regardless of whether they are medicated, proprietary, patented, or otherwise.
- Any liquor that is consumed as a beverage and that, when consumed in sufficient amounts, typically results in full or partial intoxication.
It is against the law for anyone under the age of twenty-one (21) to purchase, attempt to purchase, drink, consume, or possess intoxicating liquor or liquors in the County of Skagit, State of Washington,
Or to continue to reside there after consuming alcohol, with the exception of alcohol given to, or permission granted to be given to, a person under the age of twenty-one (21) for medicinal purposes, or administered to him by his physician.
Know more about intoxicating liquor with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/8805775
#SPJ4
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Sarah has been working as an administrative assistant at the same company for 30 years. She goes through the motions at her job with little motivation. She has realized that she will never get promoted, and has become extremely defeated. According to strain theory, Sarah is an example of a(n) ______.
a. ritualist
b. rebellionist
c. conformist
d. innovator
Answer:
Sarah is an example of a (n) a. ritualist.
Explanation:
Sociologist Robert Merton developed the strain theory, according to which people show different responses to social and cultural values and the way they are supposed to achieve those values. There are people who accept both the goal and the means to achieve it. Others may reject both, for example.
A ritualist is the individual who rejects the goals, but still accepts the expected way to achieve them. Sarah seems to have previously accepted the goals. Now that she has come to realize she will never be promoted, she no longer fights for those goals. Still, she keeps on going through the motions. She is still engaged in the activity that was supposed to take her to those goals, but will not. Sarah is, therefore, a ritualist.
