Answer:
First-past-the-post
Explanation:
The single candidate voting method that prevails by far is A first-past-the-post (also called "plural", "relative majority", or "winner takes all"), in which each voter votes on a choice, and the choice that receives the most votes wins, even if it receives less than the majority of votes combined.
This sort of system tends to quickly create favorites and concentrate the options so the votes "won't be lost" during the election by trying to elect a candidate that is less known (many candidates are prematurely dropped for the perceived notion of "not-standing-a-change" against bigger parties).
Answer:
..i-..oh okay..wow..i-i...never...really though of..sleeping like that....i-..oh okay..wow..i-i...never...really though of..sleeping like that....i-..oh okay..wow..i-i...never...really though of..sleeping like that....i-..oh okay..wow..i-i...never...really though of..sleeping like that..
Explanation:
Adam Smith (1723 – 1790) was a Scottish economist. In 1776, he published The Wealth of Nations, which became the foundation of modern economics.
Smith saw the first duty of government was to protect the nation from invasion. Next, he supported an independent court system and administration of justice to control crime and protect property. Finally Smith favoured a system of “public works” that profits-seeking individuals may not be able to efficiently build and operate.
At the beginning stages of industrialization, Smith recognized that repetitive factory jobs dulled the minds o workers. Smith wanted all classes, even the poorest, to benefit from the free-market system. This is why I think Adam Smith would agree with government interventions with businesspeople like Social Security, minimum-wage laws, child-labour laws and anti-monopoly laws.
Featured snippet from the web
Federalists wanted a strong central government that would rule the people of the United States directly and not through the state governments. Anti-federalists wanted a weak central government... ... Federalist were for a system of strong federal courts while Anti-federalists were for limits on the federal courts. (btw im army too :) )
I’m going to write it on paper and then post it for u
