1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastovalidia [21]
2 years ago
7

Join me on quizzes code 4125701

World Languages
2 answers:
sammy [17]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the code 4125701 is invalid

Explanation:

Vlad1618 [11]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

brainliest me

btw nice to meet you

You might be interested in
Summarize how state delegates solved problems
topjm [15]
State Delegates solved problems by voting about it in the Congress. 
7 0
3 years ago
Help please,,,,,,,,,,,
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:1.)A 2.)C 3.)A 4.)B 5.) A

Explanation:

Antonyms are opposite and Synonyms are the same meaning

6 0
3 years ago
How you say "Just wanted to say hi" in Japanese? in kanji and romaji would be helpful. thank you
Anastasy [175]
Just wanted to say hi in japanese is chodo hai to iitakatta
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Evaluate the imapcf of gautrain in the economy ​
natka813 [3]

Explanation:

A new study on the socioeconomic impact of the Gautrain indicates that the rapid-rail system adds R6. 64-billion to the Gauteng economy's gross domestic product (GDP) – or 0.56% – during a typical year of operation. Carbon emissions from the Gautrain are considerably lower per passenger transported than for private vehicles, notwithstanding the higher speeds and even when there are no major traffic incidents. Energy use by rail is three to five times more efficient than cars per person kilometer based on full capacity.

4 0
3 years ago
Are disasters today less "natural" than they<br> use to be? why<br> or<br> why not?
ozzi

Disasters began turning unnatural again in the 1970s, when researchers’ attention shifted away from physical hazards and toward the vulnerability of people and communities .Nature remains full of hazards, but only some of them wreak disaster. It is human-built structures, not the shaking ground, that kill when an earthquake strikes; people live, often out of desperation, in low-lying slums where flooding is a certainty; well-intentioned forest managers fuel bigger fires; evacuation systems fail; nuclear plants are built along risky coasts; and devastated communities either get help to survive and recover, or they don’t.  

There’s another reason that the “natural disaster” label has long outlived its expiration date. It’s really about blame—deflecting it, dissipating it, or removing it from the equation completely. But unfortunately for the blameworthy, science is learning more every year about how human activity is contributing not only to natural-looking disasters but even to the fluxes of air, earth, and water that inflict the destruction. This didn’t start with greenhouse emissions, but it may end there. Climate disruption has collapsed the last walls between the human and the natural—and the storms are growing.

Hopes this helps in some sort of fashion :)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the three goals of persuasive speaking is the hardest to achieve
    11·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me with this
    5·1 answer
  • Kasingkahulugan ng paninira
    6·1 answer
  • What literary devices is most clearly used in this passage
    10·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    13·2 answers
  • Atividade de Português
    5·1 answer
  • Female cattle that have not calved are called
    11·2 answers
  • Write true or false:
    13·1 answer
  • Write a vivid description of your experience in your new class​
    6·1 answer
  • Inkulumo elungiselelwe ngesihloko esithi Ububi Bokuba Nguthathekile​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!