<span>Accessibility | Telecommunications Industry Association</span><span>www.tiaonline.org/policy/accessibility</span>
... Section 255 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and ... TIA hosts the FCC for a webinar on its Accessibility and Innovation Initiative
Generally considered to be the first great war of the 20th century, the conflict saw Russia and Japan – the two dominant nations in north-east Asia – battle for control over Korea and Manchuria.
<span>But why did the war break out, and what is its historical significance? Here, Dr Philip Towle from the University of Cambridge tells you everything you need to know about the conflict.</span>
Answer: Cognitive
Explanation: The cognitive component of an individual's attitude could be explained as the belief, opinion, verdict or one's submission about a particular object, course, event, group or happening. The cognitive component of attitude lies in one's perception, verdict or Judgement on certain happenings or issue.
In the scenario above, Gerry's perception, stance or belief on jaguar cars is that they are poorly made and prone to mechanical problem. Therefore, Gerry's stance or belief makes up the cognitive component of Gerry's attitude. And this has to change before a jaguar car can be sold to him
According to Malthusian theory of population, population increases in a geometrical ratio, whereas food supply increases in an arithmetic ratio. This disharmony would lead to widespread poverty and starvation, which would only be checked by natural occurrences such as disease, high infant mortality, famine, war or moral restraint. His main contribution is in the agricultural sector. According to this theory there are two steps to control the population: preventative and positive checks. Preventative means control in birth rate, and uses of different methods to control birth; and positive checks means natural calamities, war, etc. His theory was wrong because Malthus only considered two factors when he established his basic graph: food supply and population growth. Other factors such as improvements in technology proved him wrong. He was right at his time but development made him wrong. If it wasn't for outside influences on population growth and food supply, his mathematical reasoning which proved his theory and was right. I HOPED THIS HELPED
