Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
Acknowledge the team for their effort.
Explanation:
By acknowledging the effort of the team that worked on the shampoo, the members of the team are encouraged and motivate, knowing that their efforts are accepted. After so doing, Logan can now tell the team about the dismal results which isn't supposed to have happened and the motivation earlier would have let the team members open to innovation.
Cheers.
Since the preferred stocks are cumulative in nature, the dividend amount not paid in the current year will be accumulated and paid in the next year.
Preferred dividend to be paid in 2017 = Value of preferred stock x Dividend rate
= (4700 x $50) x 5%
= 11750
Dividend to be paid in 2018 = same as 2017 as no new preferred stock issued
= 11750
Total dividend to be paid in 2018 = Dividend to be paid in 2018 + Dividend to be paid in 2017 – Dividend paid in 2017
= 11750 +11750 -7900
= $15600
Answer:
Someone owes you money
Explanation:
negative balance simply means that your card issuer owes you money,
When an economist makes a prediction that a rise in consumer incomes will increase the demand for bicycles sold by a bicycle company, it is made on assumption that bicycles are normal goods. Therefore, the option A holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of normal goods?</h3>
The normal goods or services being sold in the market of an economy can be referred to or considered as goods that have a direct relation with the demand for such goods, which are affected by consumer income.
As per the behavior of normal goods, it can be inferred that their demands increases with a given increase in the disposable income of the consumer, such as the one in the condition given above.
Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of normal goods.
Learn more about normal goods here:
brainly.com/question/24100151
#SPJ4
An economist for a bicycle company predicts that a rise in consumer incomes will increase the demand for bicycles. This prediction assumes that bicycles are _____.
A. Normal goods
B. Luxury Goods
C. Inferior Goods
D. None of the Above
