The correct answer is C. Observing what happened to the Spartans and the Romans shows that it is best to destroy a newly acquired state that is accustomed to freedom.
Explanation:
The text focuses on explaining the differences between the Spartans and the Romans when conquering new territories. The author explains the Romans destroyed and dismantled new territories, and were successful. On the opposite, the Spartans were not successful because they only established a government in new territories.
This implies, destroying new states is a better strategy than allowing freedom, this is reinforced by the idea "he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it may expect to be destroyed by it" that shows the need to destroy or dismantle new states to control them. Thus, the main idea is that destruction is the best strategy to use with acquired states which is proven by comparing Spartans and Romans.
If he is going with the descriptive investigation approach, everything will mostly be done qualitatively. This approach does not focus on the conclusive result of the study. Instead, it focuses on the detailed path to get to an effective analytical tools, approach or methodolody towards the conclusion.
Thus, with descriptive investigation, you could trim out unnecessary approaches and single out the effective ones. In this way, you will maximize your resources in a short period of time. Thus, the answer is choice A.
Answer:
Tessie's obviously negative view of the lottery after she wins conflicts with the readers' previous view of the lottery as rather mundane to create suspense about why Tessie gets so upset.
Explanation:
The correct answer is B, i think sorry if im wrong.
