1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cricket20 [7]
1 year ago
11

Besides the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, do you think any of the events above should have triggered the United States to go

to war? If so, which one and why that one? If not, what should it take for the United States to go to war?
History
1 answer:
Amanda [17]1 year ago
5 0

The relationship between Japan and the United States had soured in the years leading up to Pearl Harbor. This began with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931, an expansion throughout the Chinese mainland that led to the Second Sino-Japanese war between China and Japan in 1937.

You might be interested in
The main reason the articles of confederation were replaced as the basis of the United States government was that they
nikklg [1K]

The Articles of Confederation were replaced by the US Constitution because the federal government had almost no power. Since the federal government had almost no power, very few new laws were passed and the US could not raise a strong army to put down Shay's Rebellion.


When creating the Articles of Confederation, framers feared giving the central (aka federal) government too much power. This was based on America's experience with a "tyrannical" central government when they were under British rule. This is why the Articles of Confederation does not give the federal government the right to tax and needs 13 out of 13 states in order to add an amendment.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Check<br>What plans did<br>Mussolini and Hitler<br>share?
dimulka [17.4K]
They wanted communism to spread. They also wanted to have everything their way.

6 0
3 years ago
why were the provinces of texas and coahuila merged into a single state by the mexican federal constitution of 1824?
VikaD [51]

Answer:

According to the Mexican Federal Constitution of 1824, why were the areas of Texas and Coahuila merged into one state? Neither province had enough people to become a separate state in Mexico. Austin, Spanish authorities wanted Texas populated to defend it from Indian attacks.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Detail how the treaty of Versailles changed the course of Europe socially, politically, economically, and culturally?
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

it was after ww2 and it was basicly a military peace agree ment with all countrys in pact

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What sub-group of these people settled in the southern coastal plain of canaan during the time of judges?
Rudik [331]
These were the philistines
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Rituals help maintain sumerian society
    5·1 answer
  • Samuel has been criticizing the policies of the state government, which has led law enforcement officials to conduct a raid on h
    6·1 answer
  • Chinese farmers were forced to serve as soldiers during wartime.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the pattern of Spanish colonization in the Caribbean.
    11·1 answer
  • 99 POINTS!
    11·2 answers
  • Can someone please help with questions 1 and 2!!
    9·1 answer
  • What marked the disappearance of the Open Range in Texas?
    15·2 answers
  • Which historical event caused thousands of prospectors to come to Numa land? in The Girl Who Gave Voice to her People
    10·1 answer
  • What repercussions did the transatlantic slave trade have on African nations
    10·1 answer
  • What was the result of Hamilton and Jefferson's differing views?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!