If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
Answer:
LowGDP, low standard of living, few capital goods, few resources,
Explanation:
1. Be more assertive
2. Stop asking for permission from others/make your own decisions
3. Get to know yourself
Idn't Spain have more colonies in Africa?
OK. During the era of exploration, the Portuguese were sailing around the coast of Africa and began their colonies in Mozambique, Angola, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde and Sao Tome y Principe. By the 1500's, Spain was preoccupied by explanding their empire in the Americas. Africa was then ignored for centuries before the introduction of quamine, which allowed Europeans to travel inland in Africa without dropping like flies from malaria. Hence, in the 1870's the scramble for Africa began! The British and French, the two largest Western powers of the day, took the most land in Africa. Germany too took colonies...Cameroon, Tanzania, Togo and Namibia were German colonies before WWI. Even Belgium took the Congo (they actually began the Scramble for Africa after circumnaviagting the Congo River). After WWI, they would also take Rwanda and Burundi from the Germans.
