Answer:
<h3>Legally insane.</h3>
Explanation:
A court may declare a defendant legally insane if he/she pass a series of insanity tests. It includes the "M'Naghten Rule" test, the "Irresistible Impulse" Test,The "Durham Rule" and The "Model Penal Code" Test for Legal Insanity.
A court may allow an insanity defense if the defendant can prove to the court that he/she did not understand what they did, failed to understand right from wrong, was unable to control impulse due to mental disease or some other factors which resulted from mental instability.
Answer:
crystallized intelligence.
Fluid intelligence.
Explanation:
Crystallized intelligence refers to the intelligence that allows us to use knowledge that was previously acquired through education and experience. It usually refers to facts, skills, and information you learned in school or from past experience.
On the other hand, fluid intelligence refers to the intelligence that allows us to reason, analyze, and solve problems. When we use this intelligence, we don't rely on any pre-existing knowledge.
In this example, Jody has to name as many state capitals as she can in a minute, this task refers to <u>information learned in school</u> (geography and capitals), so this test would be a test of crystallized intelligence.
Aditi is trying to complete analogies between pairs of abstract diagrams, she is using <u>her ability to analyze and solve problems</u> without relying on pre-existing knowledge. Thus, this would be a test of fluid intelligence.
A code that generally prescribes standards of conduct states principles expressing responsibilities and defines the roles and duties of the professionals to whom they apply
<h3>What is standards of conduct ?</h3>
Standards of conduct can be regarded as the principles that list the responsibility as well as duties of individual in the society.
Therefore, conduct states principles expressing responsibilities and defines the roles.
learn more about standards of conduct at:
brainly.com/question/917245
Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness are what he lists as "natural rights". I think he meant that every human should be born with these rights and they therefore "natural". He meant that these rights come with being human, and do not have to be earned.
