1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuri [45]
2 years ago
6

How did the Mongol bow differ from the medieval English longbow?

History
1 answer:
Soloha48 [4]2 years ago
7 0
Different tools for different jobs used differently by different people.

Remember, from a population base of about the same size (two million) the Mongols deployed far more archers much farther from home. There were twice as many Mongol archers (30,000) at Mohi alone (thousands of miles from home) than there were English archers at Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt (right next door) combined (15,000).

The English would not have done any better, nor worse, with the Mongol recurve bow. The Mongols would have done worse with the longbow. That’s due to how they fought with them, not how good or bad the bows were.

Draw weights were comparable. English longbows ranged from 80–120lbs at the beginning of the Hundred Years War (which the English lost BTW) to 100–140lbs by the end. By the 16th century most of the bows found on the the ship Mary Rose were in the 140–160lbs range, with the heaviest at about 185lbs.
You might be interested in
What are some challenges you think the next generation will face?
arlik [135]

Answer:

Without a serious focus on green growth, falling water tables, rising food/water/energy prices, population growth, resource depletion, climate change, terrorism, and changing disease patterns, catastrophic results around the world are likely and will force migrations over the next few decades to make much of the world ...

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
At the first Continental Congress in 1774, the delegates decided to send a letter to King George III asking him to repeal the ta
Andrews [41]

If I had been a delegate to the First Continental Congress, I would have agreed to this course of action. Yes, the letter was the correct action to take.

<h3>Here are the reasons why I would have agreed to send a letter to King George III.</h3>

First, this was an injustice. American colonists worked so hard to make a living and the British crown always wanted more money from them.

That is why I should have signed the letter asking King George III to repeal the taxes that violated colonists' rights in the 13th. colonies.

American colonists were upset and tired of the British government. The English imposed severe taxation such as the Navigational Acts, the Stamp Act, and the Tea Act, among many others.

The First Continental Congress was a delegate's assembly held from September to October 1776 in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Delegates from twelve of the thirteen colonies assisted the gathering in Philadelphia.

Some of the delegates who attended the Congress were George Washington and Samuel Adams.

We conclude that if I had been a delegate to the first Continental Congress, I would have agreed to send a letter to the King of England asking him to repeal the taxes that violated colonists' rights.

Learn more about the First Continental Congress here:

brainly.com/question/888684

#SPJ1

5 0
11 months ago
Carefully study the chart above. Which country has the smallest gap between literacy rates for men and women (for all the adults
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

Egypt

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was a reason for southern secession? A. choosing Jefferson Davis as leader of the Confederate States B. f
Levart [38]

The correct answer is: Familiarity with and disdain for the Northern industrial workplace.

In the 1860s<em> </em><em>the Southern states based their economy on agriculture,</em> their crops required lots of manpower so they relied on slavery to work on their harvest. <em>The Northern states were beginning to base their economy on manufacture and factories </em>and they relied mainly on immigrants to work on factories, and were in favor of the abolition of slavery.

So when Abraham Lincoln won the elections in 1860, the Southern states felt the government was in hands of the Northern states and that it no longer watched over the Southern interests, <em>they saw with disdain the Northern activity and that became a reason for the Southern secession from the Union.</em>


8 0
3 years ago
Georgia ratified the new United States Constitution in 1787 MAINLY because Georgians A) were pleased that large states won negot
RUDIKE [14]

Georgians were pleased that slavery would be protected and there would be a bicameral legislature. The delegation from Georgia worked to make both larger and smaller states happy with their representation and they worked to have slavery protected in the Constitution.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • cant find it anywhere D: im stuck ;-; Who creates the Federal Budget? a. Federal Reserve c. Council of Economic Advisors b. Hous
    10·2 answers
  • What role do the states play in the United States amendments process?
    9·1 answer
  • All of the following are famous modern economics EXCEPT
    8·2 answers
  • Help !!
    8·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Reconstruction Amendments?
    6·2 answers
  • Which was considered the capital of the eastern roman empire
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement is true of the state legislatures of South Carolina and
    13·1 answer
  • The Central Powers included which countries?
    5·2 answers
  • Why does Senator Morrill consider the United States "the paradise of the laboring man?"
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me? :(
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!