A colony created by a grant of land from a monarch to an individual or family is a;
A. Proprietary colony
Answer:
paralyzed and time in office
Explanation:
1) FDR was paralyzed from the waist down and couldn't walk. He used a wheelchair. I would recommend looking this up to find some personal reasons as to why this is interesting. I however find it interesting because we still aren't quite sure if the cause of his paralysis was polio or Guillen-barre's syndrome.
2) FDR was the only president to serve for 4 terms. Again I recommend looking this up to find something you find interesting. I however just think it is interesting because during the time he was president (the Great Depression and beginning of WW2) the United States was pretty unstable, which shows the trust that the people had in their president at the time.
Answer: August 3 2021 primary. Umm an ID?
Explanation:
Answer: For profit.
Explanation:In the early 1800s, the British government, motivated by profit and security, marched into the Southeast Asian nation of Burma, also known today as Myanmar. A Buddhist country rich in natural resources, Burma was an expansionist power that bordered India, one of Great Britain's most prized colonies.
Hope this helps! Brainlist?
Answer:
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court
