Yes we can
Generalization : a general statement made from a specific case
Specific case : China is a communist country
General Statement : All of the people that live in China don't have a freedom to choose their occupation
Explanation : in communist country , the government is the one that choose the jobs for the people, so we can make that general statement
Answer: First Give God His Share, Give The Poor And Maybe What I really need I’ll spend for and save the rest of it
Explanation:
Answer:
(B) the nerve connecting the olfactory bulb sends impulses directly to the limbic system
Explanation:
The limbic system is the part of the brain that regulates memory, emotions, and hunger. It is composed by the hypothalamus, the thalamus and the amygdala of the brain. On the other hand, the olfactory bulb is responsible for coding and directing the information that enters through the smell through the olfactory neurons and to discern between the different smells.
Due to the proximity of the olfactory bulb to the limbic system, an associative learning process occurs in which the amygdala and the hippocampus interact; smells are associated with situations such as aversive or reinforcing stimuli, so certain odors provoke positive responses and other negative or aversive responses, directly affecting emotions.
I hope this information can help you.
Tax revenue can be outlined as the<span> revenues collected from taxes on </span>financial gain<span> and profits, </span>Social Security<span> contributions, taxes imposed on </span>product<span> and services, payroll taxes, taxes on the </span>possession<span> and transfer of property, and </span>alternative<span> taxes.
</span><span>
General welfare, education, and food stamps are just three of the public services that are made available through the revenue from taxes.</span>
<span>C. Wright Mills had a negative view of the elite-mass dichotomy. His viewpoint fits into the following paradigm: <u>conflict.
</u><u />The other options don't really make sense: symbolic interactionism is incorrect because there is no interaction here. Functionalism is also not true because his negative views don't really serve any function in the society. And feminism obviously doesn't fit here, which means that the conflict paradigm is correct.<u>
</u></span>
