Plymouth colony would be the answer.
First of all, it should be mentioned that Rudyard Kipling was a renowned author of short stories and books, among them the famous The Jungle Book, which tells the story of Mogli. In this sense, it is also worth mentioning the advent of Neocolonialism, which used the notion of race domination to justify the capitalist expansion it wished to undertake. Kipling was one of the minds harnessed by Neocolonialism, and his works, which preached the inferiority of non-white people and, consequently, white supremacy, can be considered racist because they aimed at the reduction of individuals based on racial criteria, at the same time time that can be considered ethnocentric because they place the Caucasian European man as the center of the world, superior to the others, and who, therefore, would have legitimacy to govern everything and everyone.
It should be noted that the five parts of the coercive Acts include:
- Massachusetts Government Act.
- Administration of Justice Act.
The Coercive Acts were the laws that were passed by the British Parliament in order to punish the colony of Massachusetts Bay.
It should be noted that colonists called the Coercive Acts the "Intolerable Acts because they believed that the acts were cruel and severe.
Learn more about the Coercive Acts on:
brainly.com/question/4235408
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Berlin Conferences I hope that helped
David Ramsey and James Winthrop differ completely towards the principle of representation in the United States,<em> they only agreed in the Bill of Rights</em>.
On one side David Ramsey, who is a federalist, believes the whole country should be governed by the same laws made by the legislation. On the other side James Winthrop is an anti federalist who believed that one of the reasons freedom in America was presereved was because the states have the right to be self-governed. He thought it would be impossible for all the states to agree and be ruled by the same laws.
