1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina [24]
2 years ago
5

Do you think that the size of roman empire led to its downfall explain​

History
2 answers:
Fantom [35]2 years ago
6 0

What do you think? Rome would have fallen to intruders on the off chance that the Huns had not moved into the west? Clarify. Impacts. Swelling. Untrust- commendable armed force. Political.

Elza [17]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I think the size of the roman empire led to its downfall because the size of the empire was big and hard to manage. They became susceptible to external, as well as internal, forces. Therefore this led to their downfall.

You might be interested in
How is a phobia deeper than simple fear?
NemiM [27]
Fear is something that happens instantly and is a defense mechanism and a phobia is an intense fear of something, phobias are generally built over time and can be very harmful. The amygdala keeps track of all of the bad things that happen too us and trigger us whenever we encounter that specific thing.
4 0
3 years ago
Unlike earlier scholars, Renaissance scholars
devlian [24]

Answer: c

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the most important word in history? Why? Please make sure to have you explanation in at least 3 sentences.
kirza4 [7]

Answer:

The most important word in history is Democracy

Explanation:

Because without democracy there would be no solution to any problem of historical conflict.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would be considered a buffalo soldier? A. a freedman serving in the US Cavalry B. a Native American servi
zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

The answer is B, a native American serving in the Union Army.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following BEST explains the difference between civilian deaths in WW I and WW II?
nevsk [136]

The reason why there is such a difference between civilian deaths in WWI and WWII was that civilians were deliberately targeted in WWII.

<h3>Why were there more civilian deaths in WWII?</h3>

In WWII, the combatants targeted civilians directly in some cases as opposed to WWI where civilian deaths were limited.

For instance, WWII saw the Nazis targeting specific populations such as Jews. The allies also targeted civilian areas during their bombing raids in order to pressure the Nazis to surrender.

Find out more on civilian deaths in WWII at brainly.com/question/10577518.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did leaders of the public school movement work to establish?
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me answer these questions
    5·1 answer
  • Fantasy coffins are popular among the __________, a West African cultural group
    10·2 answers
  • What was a new economic practice of the 1920s that was responsible for people buying more products
    15·1 answer
  • Please answer this cause I need to get ready for my test and I need a good grade.
    11·1 answer
  • When herbert hoover took office in 1929, he brought to the presidency?
    14·1 answer
  • What evidence could the police use to prove that Joe stole the money?
    13·2 answers
  • Virtue means the state of being moral, good , or righteous (true/false)
    8·2 answers
  • I need the correct answer
    10·1 answer
  • What were the political and economic reactions to the little ice age?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!