Do you think that the size of roman empire led to its downfall explain

2 answers:

6 0

What do you think? Rome would have fallen to intruders on the off chance that the Huns had not moved into the west? Clarify. Impacts. Swelling. Untrust- commendable armed force. Political.

Elza [17]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I think the size of the roman empire led to its downfall because the size of the empire was big and hard to manage. They became susceptible to external, as well as internal, forces. Therefore this led to their downfall.

You might be interested in

Which best describes Richard Nixon's first term as president?

worty [1.4K]

The answer is Nixon acquired various difficulties, including a war, and expected to figure
out how to join a separated country.

Explanation:
Nixon expected specialist after Kennedy's death and needed to figure out how to reassure a
lamenting country. Nixon moved toward becoming president when the country was
encountering monetary thriving and was loaded up with expectation. Nixon assumed control

4 0

2 years ago

What are the different types of maps that are used by geographers?

makvit [3.9K]

Political Map
Physical map
Topographic map
Economic map
Climatic map
Thematic map

3 0

3 years ago

How did railroads help the growth of standard oil

ch4aika [34]

In turn, the railroads had a great impact on the steel industry. ... The rapid rise of the steel and railroad industries between the end of the Civil War and the early 1900s spurred the growth of other big businesses, especially in the oil, financial, and manufacturing sectors of the economy.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!

3 0

3 years ago

True or false: Washington wanted the U.S. to be allied with Britain. *

Dimas [21]

Answer:

flase?

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who are the sufi? Why are they important to the history of India