1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inysia [295]
2 years ago
12

summarize the 1931 event and its signficance which led to darastic change in the international staus quo

History
1 answer:
goldenfox [79]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:What happened in 1933 during the Great Depression?

Over the next several years, consumer spending and investment dropped, causing steep declines in industrial output and employment as failing companies laid off workers. By 1933, when the Great Depression reached its lowest point, some 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country's banks had failed.

Explanation:

The collapse of Creditanstalt caused the Bank of France, the National Bank of Belgium, the Netherlands Bank, and the Swiss National Bank to begin a run on the U.S. dollar for their gold reserves, and forced the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates from 1.5% to 3.5% to maintain the gold standards,

You might be interested in
What is the reign of terror?
Kipish [7]

A period of remorseless repression or bloodshed, in particular Reign of Terror, the period of the Terror during the French Revolution. Through Sep 5, 1793 – Jul 28, 1794

5 0
2 years ago
Did the Magna Carta influence the American colonists’ ideas about government?
Vikki [24]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

It was a document read only in England and did not influence the American colonists. it was an agreement between some of the American colonists to follow rules when they established their colony.

4 0
2 years ago
In which situation would a writer most likely use formal language? Apex?
Serjik [45]
Talking to a person you do not know, an email to a business representative, and similar would be situations where someone would have to use formal language.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is much easier to pull down a government thing to build it up at such a season as this
kaheart [24]
Is this a question? If yes, what exactly do you mean?:)
5 0
3 years ago
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these would MOST likely impact providers of a local business (a restaurant, hair salon, etc)?
    9·2 answers
  • What is a soldier that fights for money called
    9·2 answers
  • Choose the flow chart below that represents the ordering of most court systems (state and federal).
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the United States suffer fewer battlefield deaths than the
    15·1 answer
  • the role of UN had begun in world war 1 . how do you think the transition has occurred in the contemperory world​
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the colonists call the war the “French and Indian War”?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC)?
    13·1 answer
  • 50 POINTS!!! PLEASE HELP
    14·1 answer
  • Who has to power to establish post offices and interstate highways?
    13·1 answer
  • Use the wall map to answer the question.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!