I believe it is the first answer
hope this helps
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Which statement about science and religion is NOT true? Would be: No scientists are religious.
Explanation:
Basically that would be the one WRONG statement because it would require for us to know that in truth all scientists are not religious, which is not possible. This statement first arises from the conclusion that science and religion are two completely incompatible areas, and therefore, any person who belongs to one cannot belong to the other. Although it is true that in many ways it seems as if science and religion do not coincide, it must be remembered that it was religious belief, and the desire to explain why the world worked the way it did, what inspired first philosophers like Aristotle, Plato, Saint Augustine, to name a few, to observe and investigate the natural world around them. Also, historically speaking, there have been many men who were religious and who became vital to the development of scientific tenets and fields of study. For all these reasons, the statement that No scientis are religious, is false.
Answer:
GMOs refers to organisms that have had changes in their DNA using genetic engineering and the threat is to make ssure they are safe for people because if this genetic modifications.
Explanation:
GMO food is food produce from organisms that have been genetically modified and people is concerned about the dangers of eating this food. However, scientific data have said that it doesn't generate a risk to human health but every GMO food needs to be examine.
Answer:
Theocracy, government by divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided. In many theocracies, government leaders are members of the clergy, and the state's legal system is based on religious law. Theocratic rule was typical of early civilizations, such as Ancient Egypt. Other modern places such as China, Sudan, and Iran.
The U.S. has more than 87,000 dams greater than six feet high (and two million overall). While many dams continue to provide benefits such as flood control, irrigation, and water supply, for other dams the cost of maintenance or the negative effects on communities, fish, and tribes justifies their removal.
Dam owners and regulators decide whether to remove a dam by weighing many factors including: the cost of removal and the ability to replace any lost power generation against avoided long-term maintenance; safety concerns; benefits to endangered fish populations; increased recreational and commercial fishing; and restoration of cultural values of nearby tribes.
By 2020, roughly 70% of dams will be more than 50 years old, inviting us to reconsider the value to the public of long-term investments in this infrastructure.
