All categories

2 years ago

Which three statements describe the success of the campaign to boycott grapes?.

History

1 answer:

Alinara [238K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Hello there my friends

--> It motivated California legislators to pass agricultural labor relations in the act in 1975.

--> It contributes to legislation that improved pay and working conditions on farms.

--> It benefits from the participation of millions of American citizens between 1962 and 1972.

Hopefully, my 3 statements about this help you

and if you don't mind, could I have the brainliest?

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Prevents a president from serving more than two terms or more than ten years *

STatiana [176]

Answer:The Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution was an addition to the United States Constitution that put a limit on how many times someone could be elected to be President. A person is limited to eight (and possibly ten) years as president. This amendment was passed by congress

on March 21, 1947

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Georgia’s counties were organized so people always lived near A. The state capital B. Army forts C.sources of water D. Their cou

svetoff [14.1K]

the answer is D .... Their county seat

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If you have been a delegate to one of the state constitutions will you be a Ferderlist or Anti-Ferderalists?

cluponka [151]

If you are a delegate, it means that you are a representative or supporter of it so if you support the state's constitution more than the country's, you are an anti-federalist because a federalist is someone who supports the states unified under one constitution so the opposite of that would be anti-federalist. So the answer is anti-federalist.

7 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast Roman government to the government of ancient Greece

Veronika [31]

Similarities

They were the most powerful democractics.

People were angry that their government had not

been able to solve the many problems facing the Republic. Julius Caesar spoke publicly to the people about these problems, and promised to solve them if he could. The people supported Caeser. He became popular with the people and more powerful.

Roman government led to series of civil wars, and form of government lost out to a kind of monarchy with an emperor at its head. The emperor still maintained the Senate, but they were at his command, and rarely voted for him. By the end of the Pax Romana, democracy was dead in Rome.

Aristotle divided Greek governments into monarchies, oligarchies, tyrannies, and democracies, and historians still use these same divisions.

Turning point was the Persian wars

Originally ruled by an oligarchy

Greeks

By: Erica C. , Tammy P. , & Alex H.

Originally ruled by republic

Only free adult men were citizens

Both had democratic government

Predisposition to favor the aristocracy

Had more success in creating a centralized government

Picture

"War and Game." Ignacio Ricci, 11 May 2011. Web. 13 Sept. 2012

Ancient Greek Vs. Ancient Romans

Romans

Both governments fell

Greeks

“Democracy.” Shannon Babbie, 2003. Web. 11 Sept. 2012.

"Roman vs. Greek Civilization." 123HelpMe.com. Web. 11 Sept. 2012.

"Important People." Nettlesworth Primary School, n.d. Web. 12 Sept. 2012.

"Comparison: Ancient Greeks & Ancient Romans for Kids.” Phillip Martin, n.d. Web. 12 Sept. 2012.

"Ancient Greek Government." Dr. Karen Carr, 7 Sept. 2012. Web. 13 Sept. 2012.

Picture "Illustration - Government Mind Map - Political Doodle Graph with Various Political Systems (democracy, Monarchy, Dictatorship, Military Regime)." 123RF Stock Photos.” N.p., 2006. Web. 12 Sept. 2012.

Picture

“Ancient Roman Government.” Giovanni Milani-Santarpia, n.d. Web. 9 Sept. 2012.

Picture

"Aristotle." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 13 Sept. 2012

Romans

The Romans' women had more freedom then the Greeks' women

Greek society began by the formation of the city state

5 0

3 years ago

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.

garri49 [273]

Answer:

The Miranda v. Arizona case is important because it ruled that:

The police must inform accused people of their rights before seeking a confession.

This ruling is based on the:

Fifth amendment

Explanation:

Deputies and police investigating crimes now have standards to follow thanks to the Miranda v. Arizona verdict, which also serves to deter crime.

Suspects can't be arrested if the police don't tell them about their constitutional rights, like the Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate themselves.

6 0

2 years ago