Ask question

Ask question

All categories

1 year ago

10

A regular deck of cards has 52 cards. assuming that you do not replace the card you had drawn before the next draw, what is the

probability of drawing three aces in a row?

1 answer:

Rudiy271 year ago

7 0

The probability of drawing three aces in a row is the likelihood of drawing three aces

The probability of drawing three aces in a row is 0.000181

<h3>How to determine the probability?</h3>

In a standard deck of 52 cards, there are 4 aces.

Given that the selection is without replacement; then we have the following selections:

First: 4 aces in 52 cards
Second: 3 aces in 51 cards
Third: 2 aces in 50 cards

The probability is then calculated as;

$P = \frac{4}{52} * \frac{3}{51} * \frac{2}{50}$

Evaluate the products

$P = 0.00018099547$

Approximate

$P = 0.000181$

Hence, the probability of drawing three aces in a row is 0.000181

Read more about probability at:

brainly.com/question/251701

You might be interested in

Which is an example of a cultural block?

Harman [31]

Answer: a. a gender bias

6 0

2 years ago

What is m∠ABC? m∠ABC = 60° m∠ABC = 67° m∠ABC = 120° m∠ABC = 127°.

NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

mABC= 127°

Explanation:

60+67 is 127

so there ya have it

7 0

2 years ago

Nagbigay liwanag sa kaniyang kaisipan means?

irina [24]

Hi,

Answer: Give light to his mental

<u>My work:</u> The Language states in your question is Filipino.

<em>Extra Information:</em> The language “Filipino” was made or rather declared to be a language in the 16th century. Made by the “Philippines” which have over 175 different languages (Back then). Now the “Philippines” have around 170 active languages that they speak!

I Hope I Helped!

4 0

2 years ago

Which citation is formatted correctly using mla guidelines? barrett, leigh. Snow removal woes. "hartford times-dispatch" 12 janu

motikmotik

The citation that is formatted correctly using MLA's guidelines is;

Barrett, Leigh. "Snow Removal Woes." Hartford Times-Dispatch 12 January 2012: B12. Print.

MLA simply means Modern Language Association. This is a format that states that when citing a newspaper article, we must write in the following order;

Write the author's last name.
Write his first name
Write the title of the article.
Write the newspaper title.
Write the name of the city.
Write the date and month and year of publication, and print.

The only option that follows this MLA format guidelines correctly is;

"Barrett, Leigh. 'Snow Removal Woes.' Hartford Times-Dispatch 12 January 2012: B12. Print.".

Read more on MLA format at; brainly.com/question/14135206

8 0

1 year ago

wariber [46]

<h2>Right answer: I and II only </h2>

If we already have the formula to find how temperature measured in degrees Fahrenheit, relates to a temperature in degres Celsius:

$C=(F-32)\frac{5}{9}$ (1)

We can know the formula to find how temperature measured in degrees Celsius, relates to a temperature in degres Fahrenheit, only by isolating F:

$F=(\frac{9}{5}C)+32$ (2)

Having both formulas, let’s begin:

I) If we want to prove that a temperature increase of 1 degree Fahrenheit is equivalent to a temperature increase of 5/9 degree Celsius:

Beginning with $1\ºF$ :

$C=(1\ºF-32)\frac{5}{9}=-17.22\ºC$

This means: $1\ºF=-17.22\ºC$

Now we are going to increase 1 degree Farenheit. In other words, we are going to use $2\ºF$ :

$C=(2\ºF-32)\frac{5}{9}=-16.66\ºC$

This means: $2\ºF=-16.66\ºC$

Calculating the difference between $-16.66\ºC$ and $-17.22\ºC$ :

$-16.66\ºC-(-17.22\ºC)=0,55\ºC$ >>>>This is equal to 5/9 degree Celsius, hence is correct

II) If we want to prove that a temperature increase of 1 degree Celsius is equivalent to a temperature increase of 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit:

Beginning with $1\ºC$ :

$F=(\frac{9}{5}1\ºC)+32$

$F=33.8\ºF$

This means: $1\ºC=33.8\ºF$

Now we are going to increase 1 degree Celsius. In other words, we are going to use $2\ºC$ :

$F=(\frac{9}{5}2\ºC)+32$

$F=35.67\ºF$

This means: $2\ºC=35.67\ºF$

Calculating the difference between $35.67\ºF$ and $33.8\ºF$ :

$35.67\ºF-33.8\ºF=1.8\ºF$ >>>>This is a proof of the statement, hence is also correct.

<h2 />

III) If we want to prove that a temperature increase of 5/9 degree Fahrenheit is equivalent to a temperature increase of 1 degree Celsius:

Beginning with $1\ºC$ :

$F=(\frac{9}{5}1\ºC)+32$

$F=33.8\ºF$

This means: $1\ºC=33.8\ºF$

Now we are going to add $\frac{5}{9}\ºF$ :

$33.8\ºF+\frac{5}{9}\ºF=34.35\ºF$

And use this value in the Celsius formula:

$C=(34.35\ºF-32)\frac{5}{9}=1.30\ºC$

This means: $1.30\ºC=34.35\ºF$

In other words: An increase in 5/9 degree Fahrenheit is equivalent to a temperature increase of 1.30 degree Celsius, <u>not 1 degree Celsius</u>.

Therefore this statement is incorrect.

4 0

3 years ago