Answer:
The central idea of the book is, aspects of good citizens
An example of interactive speeches is speaker defines a word when she sees the audience is confused.
<h3>What are interactive speeches?</h3>
Interactive speeches are speeches that are delivered which require the maximum interaction between the speaker and the audience.
Both parties are involved in the speeches.
Therefore, An example of interactive speeches is speaker defines a word when she sees the audience is confused.
Learn more about interactive speeches below.
brainly.com/question/27617352
#SPJ1
The lines in the poem that best shape the theme that joy can be found in experiencing the natural world are: "Beside the Lake, beneath the trees, /Flittering and dancing in the breeze." "A poet could not but be gay/ In such a jocund company". The first lines "Beside the Lake..." depict a natural scenery and the lines that follow: "A poet could not but be gay...", express that the company of nature makes a poet very happy and feel in good company. The theme is expressed clearly in this set of lines.
"The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore...But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world." lines 1-11.
The main reason for asking yourself what you agree and disagree with in a text is that it helps you prepare to qualify the author's claim (C). In other words, by asking yourself what you believe about a text you read, you start the process of evaluating the text, because you assess the author's opinions comparing and contrasting them to yours.
Answers A and B, are both complementary so you cannot choose just one of them. In order to be correct they have to be combined, because by asking yourself what you agree or disagree with in a text you may choose to defend some of the author's claims while challenging others. Also, answer D is wrong because deciding which of the ideas you agree or disagree with is not related to the strengths of the text. You may disagree with an author's claim but this doesn't mean that it wasn't supported well by him/her. So, this could not be considered a weak point of the text.
