1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valina [46]
1 year ago
12

Help me answer these questions, they’re my last questions!

History
1 answer:
BabaBlast [244]1 year ago
5 0

Answer:

To reduce soft money contributions to political parties.

it has caused spending by interest groups to increase

Explanation:

giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech:

in "citizen united v fec" the supreme court said because corporations giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech and the government cant restrict it. giving money is protected under the first amendment

Soft money is unregulated donations to political parties for general "party-building" purposes, not the support of a particular candidate so it avoid  various legal limitations

Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act aka McCain-Feingold Act is a major amendment of the Federal Election Campaign Act 1971 passed by the US congress in 2002. Its goal was to reduce the increased use of soft money to fund advertising by political parties.

brainly.com/question/11364371

investopedia

wikipedia

You might be interested in
What is the major difference between an argumentative thesis and an explanatory thesis?
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

an argumentive thiesis argues some thing wheras an explanitory theisis explains something.

8 0
2 years ago
Why did the Europeans delay creating permanent settlements in Australia and the Pacific? (choose all that apply)
Usimov [2.4K]

The reasons why the Europeans delayed setting up settlements included:

  • The extreme distance.
  • The inhospitable climate.

<h3>Why did the Europeans delay setting up settlements?</h3>

Australia and some areas in the Pacific had some very extreme climates with Australia have several deserts and dangerous animals.

Coupled with the fact that these areas were extremely far from Europe, the Europeans took their time to set up settlements there because it would require more effort than setting up colonies elsewhere.

Find out more on European colonization at brainly.com/question/12998233.

6 0
2 years ago
30 points ANSWER ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST: HISTORY
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

Avantage British: 1. They have better weaponry, 2. If they failed then they could still go home and have a stable life, 3. They were trained better

Advantages Patriots: 1. They were fightig for a good cause, 2. They actually won the Revoloutionary war, 3. They were promoting freedom.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How did the govrment protect frace​
Nana76 [90]

***NOT AN ANSWER*** try saying "government" and "France"

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement captures the attitude of the French Revolution to the Catholic Church in France?
Kamila [148]

Answer:

the correct answer is A. Napoleon made relations with the Pope much worse.

hope this helps!

(please mark me as brailyest)

Explanation:

Ask me if you want or need the explanation.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal in response to
    11·1 answer
  • Moses - Why is the Holy Land an important site for your faith?
    8·1 answer
  • Which option best completes the table? Make up of nations worldwide<br> Need help ASAP
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement correctly compares the Florida Constitution to the US Constitution?
    11·1 answer
  • Around 32% of legislation supported by the president passes during the House within one year. During the same year, 64% of presi
    15·2 answers
  • The area in which the law of demand best applies is
    11·1 answer
  • What was the biggest factor that caused the Mexican revolution?
    7·2 answers
  • Position on the Columbian Exchange thesis
    10·1 answer
  • Look at the screenshot
    8·1 answer
  • Which united states president tried to expand the size of the supreme court to 15 justices.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!