Answer:
The question is missing the below options:
A $3000 ?B$10,000 ?C$30,000 ?D$100,000
The correct option is A,as expected loss is $3000 as computed below
Explanation:
The expected loss can be computed thus:
probability of theft*property loss of theft+probability of no theft*property loss of no theft
Probability of theft is 0.3(30%)
probability of no theft 0.7(1-0.3)
property loss of theft is $10000
property loss when no theft occur is $0
Expected loss=0.3*$10000+0.7*$0
expected loss=$3000+$0
expected loss=$3000
One needs to know that the entire probability of theft and no theft occurring is 1,so when one is given as 0.3,automatically the remainder belongs to other.
Answer: nice to know pls let me keep the points
Explanation:
In the modern Milton Bradley rules for Battleship, Salvo is listed as a variation "for more experienced players", with the number of shots being equal to the number of ships that the firing player has remaining.
Answer: B.)
the nation was at least somewhat divided on the new Constitution
Explanation:
While, broadly speaking, people in urban areas and states with larger populations tended to be Federalists, while rural residents of smaller states (by population) tended to be Anti-Federalists, the country was strongly divided on the issue of ratifying the new Constitution
(PREPWORKS)
YOU GOT THIS
YOUR WELCOME
If you have an argument that is weak and uncogent, the conclusion may be either true or false.
An argument is a collection of two or more statements, one of which is supported by another. A conclusion is a proposition supported and a premise is a proposition supporting the conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to build a conclusion based on the premises or the evidence provided by the premises.
An inductive argument is one that claims that the conclusion follows with some degree of probability. In other words, premises make the conclusion more likely to be true, and premises true make the conclusion less likely to be false. Inductive arguments are powerful when given that the premises are true, the conclusion is unlikely to be false.
An inductive argument is weak when the conclusion is likely false given the premises are true. A strong argument is cogent if the premise is correct. A strong argument is uncogent if at least one of its premises is wrong.
Know more about uncogent argument here
brainly.com/question/13445406
#SPJ4
