The Dred Scott Supreme Court case ruled that slaves are property and are allowed in all states/territories, even if slavery is outlawed in the state constitution.
This idea supports the concept of nullification, as states that abolished slavery would nullify (refuse) to follow this ruling because they felt it was unconstitutional.
This idea also limited the power of the federal government to restrict the expansion of slavery because the court ruled that slaves do not have legal rights and are considered property no matter where they go. This meant that slavery can essentially exist anywhere in the US and the federal government couldn't change that unless they made a national law/amendment that outlawed slavery.
France entered World War I when, after mobilizing on 1 August, its government declared war on Austria-Hungary on 11 August 1914. ... France had had a military alliance with Russia since 1894, designed primarily to neutralize the German threat to both countries. Germany had a military alliance with Austria-Hungary. The short-term French reaction after 1871 was Revanchism: a sense of bitterness, hatred and demand for revenge against Germany, and demand for the return of the two lost provinces. Paintings that emphasized the humiliation of the defeat came in high demand, such as those by Alphonse de Neuville.
First one for sure
im guessing third one too
plz wait for another person to answer the rest but im pretty sure its only those two
hope this helps
Answer:
Popular Sovereignty
Explanation:
When the representatives are elected to congress, the principle of government that applies is the Popular sovereignty. The principle of popular sovereignty states that the authority and power to create as well as sustain the government lies among the people of the country. It is based on the concept that people are real rulers in a democracy and the elected representatives are servants of people who are the sovereigns.
I would go with Brown v Board of Education. It gave more rights to African Americans and made them one step closer into beating segregation. Through the court case, segregation in schools was deemed unconstitutional, and so was segregation in other public places.
