Answer:
false
Explanation:
the culture of the place the person is living in will defienetly be impactful on the person.
Corporations are often accused of despoiling the environment in their quest for profit. Free enterprise is supposedly incompatible with environmental preservation so that government regulation is required.
Such thinking is the basis for current proposals to expand environmental regulation greatly. So many new controls have been proposed and enacted that the late economic journalist Warren Brookes once forecast that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could well become "the most powerful government agency on earth, involved in massive levels of economic, social, scientific, and political spending and interference.
But if the profit motive is the primary cause of pollution, one would not expect to find much pollution in socialist countries, such as the former Soviet Union, China, and in the former Communist countries of Eastern and Central Europe. That is, in theory. In reality, exactly the opposite is true: The socialist world suffers from the worst pollution on earth. Could it be that free enterprise is not so incompatible with environmental protection after all?
I believe it’s C.
A political map shows countries in different colors which helps to understand the map better
A large volume of air that has nearly the same temperature and humidity at different locations at the same altitude is called the Air Mass. Air mass covers hundreds or thousands of square miles and adapt to the characteristics of the surface below them at the same time they are also classified according to latitude and their continental or maritime source regions.
A ruler-like symbol used to measure distance on a map is a scale. It shows the ratio of the distance on the map to the actual distance.
Hope this helps! :)
