Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
The answer is Doric ionic and Corinthian. Doric is the oldest and plainest
It means that religion will never meddle with running the nation, and it can't figure out who's chosen for specific positions and who isn't. For instance, they can't dismiss qualified possibility for having distinctive religious convictions.
The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is a proviso inside Article VI, Clause 3. By its plain terms, no administrative officeholder or worker can be required to cling to or acknowledge a specific religion or tenet as an essential to holding a bureaucratic office or a national government work. It promptly pursues a provision requiring all government and state officers to take a pledge or attestation to help the Constitution. This statement contains the main express reference to religion in the first seven articles of the U.S. Constitution.
Answer:
socially defined pattern of behavior that is expected of a person in a given setting or group
Explanation:
Social role: In social psychology, the term "social role" is described as a specific set of rights, beliefs, behaviors, norms, as they are being conceptualized by different people in a particular social situation. In other words, it states the behaviors, expectations, and responsibilities an individual ought of adopting in a few specific situations. However, an individual's normal or expected behavior is being reinforced by the individual itself and society.
Answer:
C) much of Western Europe was United under a single ruler
Explanation:
Charmalagne began his campaign to obtain new territories for his new kingdom in the late 700s.
His conquests were successful. As soon as he defeat foreign territories, he transform them into one of their own and placed the Men he trust to take care of the new territories. In early 800s, he managed to unite the majority of western and central Europe under his rule, put it under the a new banner, which later on called the Holy Roman Empire.
