Answer:
Formal operational
Explanation:
Jean Piaget develop a theory of cognitive development, according to which, children and teenagers go through different stages in the process of cognitive development. Each stage is qualitatively different from each other and as they go through stages, their thinking go through changes, from thinking based on actions to thinking based on ideas.
The last stage of his theory is called the formal operational stage and it takes place between age of 12 and up. During this stage, adolescents start to think abstractly and reason about hypothetical problems, they are also able to formulate hypothesis and test them in order to find theories and solutions to different problems based on abstract thought.
In this example, Raj is 12 years old and uses statistical analysis and scientific principles to predict the course of weather in New York. We can see that <u>he is thinking in an abstract way and using abstract tools such as statistical analysis in order to create his theory. </u>Therefore, because of his age and the type of thinking he is having, he is most likely in the formal operational stage of development.
I think we should have a vice president. If the president dies suddenly we won't want to wait years to vote again.We want a president right away. And if we are dealing with a problem in this country that only the president can take care of and he dies. The vice president can come in and resolve the problem. intead of waiting. if we wait the problem might get worse. So yes we should always have a vice president.
The correct answer is the alarm stage.
According to Hans Seyle's <span>general adaptation syndrome (GAS) model, when faced with and responding to stressors, individuals and animals go through three stages: Alarm, Resistance and Exhaustion. During the Alarm stage, individuals have their sympathetic nervous system (or fight-or-flight response) activated. This means that they aroused with a burst of energy to either fight the threat or flee from it. In Nancy's example, when she encountered the rattlesnake, she experienced the alarm stage of the GAS model, where she was prepared to flee from the rattlesnake. </span>
An expansive understanding of powers granted to the federal government best describes if loose constructionism.
Loose Constructionism is the judicial philosophy whereby the constitution is interpreted loosely, typically analyzing between the lines, to extract a that means. When practicing loose constructionism, justices will take an difficulty and look at the context of it, and then on the constitution. Justices that are described as free constructionists tend to favour Federal government power over that of states strength and rights. They tend to be labelled as liberals.The notion that the charter must be interpreted on this way originates from the concept that when writing the constitution, it was left deliberately vague so that it can be interpreted on this manner, to allow it to be flexible. In addition to this is the belief that the Founding Fathers might not have known how the modern world could have looked, so wanted the charter to be interpreted in the present day.
Learn more about Loose Constructionism here:-
brainly.com/question/2511939
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. Andy, because he is the less elastic factor
Explanation:
