People who develop an internal locus of control believe that they are responsible for their own success. Those with an external locus of control believe that external forces, like luck, determine their outcomes.
Answer:
here's what I would put:
Explanation:
If i were in this situation, I wouldn't use things such as violence, weapons, etc. I would prepare myself for this kind of situation and take self defense lessons, as to where I could stop the intruder but not hurt them. I would also install a goood security system, like locks and cameras.
Answer:
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................979 I. THE STRUCTURE OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND ITS DISPUTED HISTORICAL MEANING...............................................................................................................982 II. JOHN ADAMS AND THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT: 1761 TO 1780 ..........................989
A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT .............................................................................989 B. JOHN ADAMS AND THE WRITS OF ASSISTANCE CASE .................................992 C. THE ENGLISH GENERAL WARRANT CASES ..............................................979 D. JOHN ADAMS’S LIBRARY .......................................................................1012 E. ADAMS AS LITIGATOR AND OBSERVER ..................................................1018 F. ADAMS AS DELEGATE TO THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS.......................1026
III. 1776 TO 1791: THE EVOLUTION OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE PROVISIONS ........1027 A. ARTICLE 14 AND OTHER EARLY SEARCH AND SEIZURE PROVISIONS.....1027 B. THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1787 .......................................1029 C. THE CONFEDERATION CONGRESS ..........................................................1030 D. THE RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION BY THE STATES...................1031 E. THE DRAFTING OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT .......................................1044
IV. ADAMS’S VIEWS AND INFLUENCE..................................................................1052 CONCLUSION........................................................................................................1060
INTRODUCTION
Courts and scholars seeking the original understanding of the Fourth Amendment have confronted two fundamental questions: what practices was the amendment designed to regulate; and how should a constitution regulate such practices? To inform the answers to those questions, this Article offers a new perspective of, and information on, the historical record regarding the framing of the amendment. It also presents for the first time a detailed examination of John Adams’s fundamental influence on the language and structure of the amendment and his knowledge of, and views on, how to regulate searches and seizures.
Most of the language and structure of the Fourth Amendment was primarily the work of one man, John Adams. Adams was an important person for many other reasons, including as the second President of the United States. His life is the subject of many biographies; his letters, works, and extensive writings are a rich source of material. Less studied and understood, however, are his knowledge of, and views on, search and seizure and his role in formulating the principles to regulate those governmental actions. Upon examination, Adams stands out in that era as having profound opportunities to examine search and seizure practices and as having the most important role in formulating the language and structure of the Fourth Amendment. If the intent of the framers is a fundamental consideration in
Explanation:
Answer:
It prevents them from injecting bias into their experiments.
Explanation:
For scientists, <u>it is important to be open-minded because a scientist searches for answers and knowledge</u> that remain unknown to date. So, <u>if the scientist remain close-minded they will not able to explore the nature and won't be able to receive new ideas in their mind. </u>
Science is a research and experimentation of nature. And to do the research on nature a clear mindset with clear observation is required which can only happen with open-mindedness.
If scientists are not open-minded then the possibilities are that they will be biased in their experiments.
