Answer:
the State of Qatar
Explanation:
sorry just noticed im wrong
Answer:
power elite
Explanation:
Mills identifies a small group of people who historically united together to run policies for their countries and the rest of the world population since they are spread among a reduced number of families across the world.
This power elites influence heavily the political and economic policies of foreign countries.
Mills, argues how an upper class formed by a social elite that historically claimed privileges and concentrates worlds financial centres.
Some other authors go as far as believing in this as a key element for conspiracy theories where the power elites can dominate entire countries and cause major outcomes like wars and economic crises to happen when dictated by them.
The error in Dinesh's confusion over correlation versus causation about his observed correlation between a gym membership and being overweight is based on <u>backward causation</u>.
<h3>What is backward causation?</h3>
Backward causation is a phenomenon that refers to a situation when an effect is regarded as the cause of an event.
For instance, Dinesh should have recognized that many more overweight people would like to have a gym membership than otherwise.
The implication is that Dinesh should not have concluded falsely that gym memberships make people gain weight.
Thus, the error in Dinesh's confusion over correlation versus causation is referred to as <u>backward causation</u>.
Learn more about backward causation at brainly.com/question/10548665
#SPJ1
The Americans most likely. It depends on what time you are talking about.
Answer:
1. I broke my promise of buying my younger one an Ice-cream when she recovered from her illness. I rather bought her a toy.
2. I lied about not knowing the whereabouts of a man who was to be punished for belonging to a particular religion.
Explanation:
1. The moral theory of utilitarianism will justify the first scenario. This theory states that an action or policy is right if it maximizes happiness or results in the greater good of society. The action I took in the first case resulted in the greater good of my sister because a cup of ice cream would not be healthy for her who was just recovering from an illness. Therefore, that decision was for her greater good.
2. The Deontology theory that states that having a morally justifiable intent is better than obtaining the right results will justify my action. For me, it was not morally right that a man should be punished for his religion and that superseded telling the truth about the man's whereabouts.
