1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AleksAgata [21]
2 years ago
14

How might the U.S. benefit if peace is achieved between Israel and the Palestinians? Okay

History
2 answers:
WARRIOR [948]2 years ago
7 0
Many Gulf residents will still remain opposed to a U.S. presence in the region for religious or Arab nationalist reasons. However, there would be less anti-U.S. hostility stemming from U.S. support of Israel.

As relations between the Arab world and Israel improve, the Gulf states would be less likely to use their leverage in the global oil market to press the United States to cut its support for Israel.
U.S. arms sales to the region, while still likely to receive Israeli scrutiny, will probably become less politically sensitive in the United States.
If a major regional crisis similar to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait were to occur again, Israel would no longer prove a heavy burden to the U.S. military. The United States could let Israel defend itself if it were attacked without fear of breaking a Gulf state coalition.
If a similar crisis erupts in the future, Israel could become an accepted, if passive, member of a Gulf state-U.S. coalition.
During a conflict or crisis, Israel's military and logistics assets might prove helpful to deploying U.S. forces. In addition, access to Israeli airspace could be valuable in sustaining an air bridge to the Gulf.
BlackZzzverrR [31]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the it bc yeah

Explanation:

its is nn=7



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
>>

>
>

>


>
>
...:)

{u gay}

You might be interested in
What helped archaeologists make a connection between Asians and the earliest Texans
matrenka [14]

Answer:dont now

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Was the United States justified in the dropping of the atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

I believe that the United States was and wasn't justified to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Explanation:

It was justified because Japan realized a surprise attack at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, after two hours of bombing, 18 U.S. ships were sunk or damaged, 188 U.S. aircraft were destroyed, and 2,403 people were killed, all of this happened while the U.S. and Japan were officially engaging in diplomatic negotiations for possible peace in Asia.

It wasn't justified because the two bombings killed between 129,000 and 226,000 people.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of the Homeland Security Agency?
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

The answer is option C.

Explanation: Homeland Security Agency was created as a domestic agency aimed at maintaining order during the crisis such as the chaos that followed the 9/11 attacks. President Bush established this department to protect the interior of America and the citizens from any kind of terror attack and also to prevent this terror attacks. But now it is working as an organization also in immigration and other interior security issues.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You receive a message in a bottle from a tropical island. It’s a page torn from a ship’s log. The document is a little water sta
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

Are we cause and effect or short term effects and long term effects

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
General( )was the first commander of US forces and later became president?
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

It's Zachary Taylor.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why do you think there are several important similarities between Buddhism and Hinduism?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the strategy of the allies in the battle of the Somme ?
    7·1 answer
  • When did civil rights become part of the u.s. constitution that applied to state and local governments?
    5·1 answer
  • The quote below is from Henry Ford in the early 1900s: "The man who puts in a bolt does not put on the nut. The man who puts on
    8·1 answer
  • In what ways does the federal government step on rights of the states? why
    15·1 answer
  • How did American farmers respond to new challenges in the mid to late 1800s
    13·1 answer
  • Why did southerners finally accept rutherford<br> b. hayes?
    6·1 answer
  • What is definition of scientific method
    12·1 answer
  • What ideas inspired or encouraged the philosophers of the enlightenment?​
    12·1 answer
  • What kind of art did Russia ban, and why?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!