Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
Economía conditions made hitlers social and economic messages
Answer:
The Industrial Revolution brought a huge change in the way farm works are done and agricultural produces are made. It not only helped in the faster means of production but also reduced the need for manual labor.
Explanation:
The Industrial Revolution was a period of extreme change or development in the field of manufacturing and production. The period between 1760 to 1820 would bring a huge shift in the lives of people and also signaled the move from rural to urban areas.
Before the advent of the Industrial Revolution, farming was done manually, with animals helping out in major works like plowing the fields. But with the Industrial Revolution, these manual labor works would become more refined and reduced. Instead of humans doing the work, machines would replace them. This was a welcome move because it increased productivity and also required lesser workers, as long as there is a worker who can operate the machines. Also, big factories would spring up and provided a different type of employment, reducing the time taken to get work done.
Because his effort to drive out the Native Americans from US territories would be 'ethnic cleansing.' <span />
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. Below are the choices that can be found elsewhere:
<span>A. He was a Supreme Court justice who ruled that slaves had no rights.
B. He was a senator from South Carolina who promoted slavery.
C. He published an antislavery newspaper called the Liberator.
D. He escaped slavery and fought for human rights.
</span>
I think the answer is D.
