A similar point between these colonies is how both were based on agriculture that served both food and commerce.
<h3>What were the differences?</h3>
- The colonials of New England focused on the export of wood.
- For this, these colonies had a very efficient transport system.
- The Chesapeake clones focused on tobacco production and export and on perennial crops that provided pasta for food.
Both colonies occupied and expelled indigenous villages, where they had to attack and suffer attacks from the natives due to the occupation of land. This changed the way of life of the natives and forced the creation of relationships between them and the settlers. Among these relationships, the Chesapeake colonies were more friendly, although they had to face some problems.
Learn more about the New England and Chesapeake colonies:
brainly.com/question/28337862
#SPJ1
Answer:The Civil War had a greater impact on American society and the polity than any other event in the country's history. It was also the most traumatic experience endured by any generation of Americans. At least 620,000 soldiers lost their lives in the war, 2 percent of the American population in 1861.
Explanation:
Answer:
d. restrain Republican opposition to the Federalist administration
Answer:
bully king I'm pretty sure
Explanation:
because ruffian means like bully, I'm not positive though
The correct answers are 1) He wanted to preserve Britain’s trading relationship with Germany and 6) He believed treating Germany harshly would lead to future conflicts.
The positions that Britain’s Prime Minister supported at the Paris Peace Conference were the following: He wanted to preserve Britain’s trading relationship with Germany and he believed treating Germany harshly would lead to future conflicts.
David Lloyd George (1863-1945) was the British Prime Minister during World War 1. During the negotiations of the Treaty of Versailles in Paris, France, George wanted to maintain the supremacy of Greta Britain in Europe and punish the Germans for the destruction caused in World War 1, but like a good diplomat and negotiator he was, he understood that harsh treatment over Germany could be the cause of another war in the not so distant future.
