These are named Active and Constructive responses to conflict.
These responses are called active as from the question portion it's clear talking related to the perspective, creating its solutions related to the issues expressing the emotions and at the end to reaching out the point of solution are denoted as the Active.
It's constrictive because the variation step by step makes you understand the positioning and clear the mindset which illustrates the position and makes it constructive.
On the other side, reflective thinking, delaying responding, and adopting are known as passive and constructive responses.
For more questions like this Active and Constructive responses visit the link below:
brainly.com/question/26009383
#SPJ4
Answer: $30.86
P = $4.95/(1 + .92) + $9.05/(1 + .92)^2 + $11.90/(1 + .92)^3 + $13.65/(1 + .92)^4
P = 4.53+7.59+ 9.14+ 9.60=$30.86
Explanation:
Dividend discount: Dividend year 1 divided by (1 plus the required rate of return)
PLUS Dividend year 2 divided by (1 plus the required rate of return) to the second power
PLUS Dividend year 3 divided by (1 plus the required rate of return) to the third power
PLUS Dividend year 4 divided by (1 plus the required rate of return) to the fourth power
Answer:
The correct answer is all of the above
Explanation:
Scrap or the rework costs are the costs which is incurred in order to repair the items that are defective. And the decision to rework or scrap an item or product, ground on the benefits or advantage of the incremental costs.
If the reworked units generate or yield greater advantage or benefit rather than the selling them as scrap, then the decision to rework will be considered.
And if the decision of rework is taken, then the management should consider the incremental costs, revenue or profit from selling the defective units as scarp and the lost profit on selling and making the new units while the rework is performed.
Answer:
Yes under the theory of conversion.
Explanation:
Conversion occurs when an individual takes possession of an item and excercises ownership of it in a way that is in conflict with the real owner's right of possession.
In this instance Eddy paid in a cheque that was not owned by him. The onus was on the bank to confirm from the account owner the real beneficiary of the check.
This would have prevented the conversion of the check through an illegal indorsement.
Conversion is a common type of fraud with regards to dividend warrants where dividend warrants edited to present a different person as the owner of the check.
Answer:
He should ask nieghbors to stop
Explanation:
Because asking nice is not a bad reason
