Answer:
Expected return on equity is 11.33%
Explanation:
Using Weighted Average Cost Capital without tax formula, overall rate of return is given by the formula:
WACC=(Ke*E/V)+(Kd*D/V)
Kd is the cost of debt at 6%
Ke is the cost of equity at 12%
D/E=1/2 which means debt is 1 and equity is 2
D/V=debt/debt+equity=1/1+2=1/3
E/V=equity/debt+equity=2/1+2=2/3
WACC=(12%*2/3)+(6%*1/3)
WACC=10%
If the firm reduces debt-equity ratio to 1/3,1 is for debt 3 is for equity
D/V=debt/debt+equity=1/1+3=1/4
E/V=equity/debt+equity=3/1+3=3/4
WACC=10%
10%=(Ke*3/4)+(6%*1/4)
10%=(Ke*3/4)+1.5%
10%-1.5%=Ke*3/4
8.5%=Ke*3/4
8.5%=3Ke/4
8.5%*4=3 Ke
34%=3 Ke
Ke=34%/3
Ke=11.33%
Answer:
this case tells us about some sort of pressures that accounts feel when financial statements are needed urgently
Explanation:
1) As for using low estimates, this step was wrong on her part. she should have been upfront in her estimates. for the items that she could not estimate there should have been an indication that such items were still under review, instead of doing what she did to give the financial estimate a good look. Using guesses or deliberately using low estimates was a bad idea, GAAP would never condone that.
She should have met with the president and let him know that finalization of the financial statements would not possible within the time frame that he has given. She could have also explain that such delays are normal and she would have given estimates of when the draft internal copy would be made available to him. such steps she took could have resulted in serious consequences for the company
2) I would not inflate or deflate the figures on purpose to make financial statements look better. If it is time to present the draft and final year-end financial statements I will have to tell the truth on the numbers and estimations used and also the reasons for that. i would have explained the constraints that i was facing. if i was still being pressurized by the president, i would have no choice than to call it quits instead of going against the ethics of my profession, since there are both ethical and legal implications to not giving inaccurate financial statements.
Answer:
a. FV = $1,000,000
rate = 9.7%
n = 40 periods
FVIFA = [(1 + 0.097)⁴⁰ - 1] / 0.097 = 407.9960231
annual savings = $1,000,000 / 407.9960231 = $2,451.00
b. FV = $1,000,000
rate = 9.7%
n = 30 periods
FVIFA = [(1 + 0.097)³⁰ - 1] / 0.097 = 155.4306295
annual savings = $1,000,000 / 155.4306295 = $6,433.74
FV = $1,000,000
rate = 9.7%
n = 20 periods
FVIFA = [(1 + 0.097)²⁰ - 1] / 0.097 = 55.35978429
annual savings = $1,000,000 / 55.35978429 = $18,063.65
Here are the answers to the question above. The two ways that a person's wealth may be taxed according to the following:
Estate taxes are taxes levied on a person’s estate when that person dies. Inheritance tax is a tax on the property or assets that someone has passed on to <span>another. Hope this answers your question.</span>
Explanation:
The preparation of the year-end 2022 income statement for Crane Co.is shown below:
Crane Co.
Income statement
For the year 2022
Revenue
Service revenue $63,500
Total revenues $63,500 (A)
Less: Expenses
Advertising expense $1,800
Rent expense $10,000
Utilities expense $2,300
Salaries and wages expense $25,300
Total expenses $39,400 (B)
Net income $24,100 (A- B)