The customer and the store and the producer of the strawberries both benefit
Answer:
Explanation:
Theorem Utilization: Coase Theorem has been created to take care of the issue of market disappointment. Market disappointment exists where value component doesn't convey productive outcome.
Example : For instance, dairy cattle of Rancher wandered into close to field. this is a sort of negative externalities. On the off chance that property right is given to rancher, at that point he can sue Rancher for making harm crop. Yet, there is no privilege to rancher, it suggests that privilege has been given to farmer. Presently here rancher will attempt to repay Rancher to lessen the size of his cows group.
Three necessary conditions:
- The rights of property should be well defined.
- The rights of property should be transferable.
- The cost of transaction must be sufficiently small.
It doesn't make a difference whom property right is given, there will be effective results. Coase hypothesis bombs where haggling cost rises or free rider issues are seen.
1,244 but ima follow so 1,245
Answers:
Correct answer:
1. Investment
2. Trade-off of present for future benefit
Incorrect answers:
1. The only possible decision
2. The consumption of consumer goods.
Answer:
59% - a)increase - b)decrease
Explanation:
First of all, we should say that the real exchange rate is calculated by multiplying the nominal exchange rate for the price index and then divide it by the price index of the other country. In another language, using this case as the example, the first nominal exchange rate is 50, as you need 50 rupees to buy 1 dollar. So to calculate the real exchange rate you need to multiply 50 by 100 (the price index of USA) and then divide it by 100 (the price index of India). Note that both price indexes are 100, just a coincidence for making easier the question. Result: 50.
Then we calculate the next real exchange rate: multiply 60 (the new nominal exchange rate) by 106 (the new US price index) and divide by 80 (the new India price index). This throws a result of 79,5. We see a 29,5 increase, and 29,5 represents 59% of 50 (the initial real exchange rate).
Then both questions is more common sense than the reading of the results we just calculated. For example, nominal exchange rate changed from 50 to 60, so the people in India will now have to collect 10 more rupees to buy the same dollar. Let's suppose a pair of shoes in USA costs 40 dollars. Before, Indians needed 2000 rupees to buy it. Now they will need 2400 rupees... it will be more expensive. Plus, the prices of USA had gone up 6%, which means the pair of shoes will now cost 42,4 dollars... even more expensive! As products in USA are more expensive, we can expect that India's consumption of American goods will decrease (law of demand).
With the American consumption of Indian goods happens the opposite, the goods in India became cheaper (price index has fallen), and for the Americans, the same dollars they had will buy more rupees when the exchange rate changed to 60.
