Answer:
Para ser miembro de la cámara baja de un país, por ejemplo, de la cámara de los comunes en el Reino Unido, o de la cámara de representantes en Estados Unidos, éstos deben ganar una elección con el fin de ser elegidos como representantes de un segmento de la población, un segmento que es menos numero que el que es representado por un miembro de una cámara alta, por ejemplo un senador.
Los miembros de las cámaras bajas suelen tener un carácter más local, menos aristocrático, y más popular que los miembros de las cámaras altas. Ésto debido a que en su origen las cámaras bajas fueron desarrolladas con el fin de balancear el poder de las cámaras altas, las cuales estaban dominadas por la aristocracia, el clero, y los poderes económicos.
The Articles of Confederation were c. a constitution that established the first US government.
<h3 /><h3>What was the Articles of Confederation?</h3>
The Articles of Confederation was the first Constitution in the national government of the United States which meant that it was the first constitution to establish a national U.S. government.
However, it needed to be replaced because it had created a very weak national government and by so doing, threatened the unity of the nation because the national government might be unable to keep states from going against each other.
Options for this question are:
- a. a constitutional revising Britain's parliament.
- b. a set of rules for governing the colonies.
- c. a constitutional that established the first us government.
- d. a set of rules of governing the northwest territory.
Find out more on the Articles of Confederation at brainly.com/question/13152253
#SPJ1
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Answer:
Speeding the object up, slowing the object down, or changing the direction
Explanation:
Yes! Trains started to be built in 1839 to connect the royal palace of Naples to the seaside. More were built in 1861 to connect from the Alps to Sicily.
