Answer:
Her nominal wage increase by: (12.48/12)-1= 0.04= 4%
Her real wage decreased by: 4% - 7$= -3%
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Ginny currently earns a (real or nominal) wage of $12.00 per hour. Ginny and her employer both expected inflation to be 4% between 2012 and 2013, so they agreed, in a two-year contract, that she would earn $12.00 per hour in 2012 and $12.48 per hour in 2013. However, suppose inflation between 2012 and 2013 turned out to be 7%, not 4%.
Her nominal wage increase by: (12.48/12)-1= 0.04= 4%
Her real wage decreased by: 4% - 7$= -3%
Answer:
A) $0
Explanation:
as per IRC section 101g, if the payment exceeds the greater of per actual cost then the excess payment amount will be taxable.
total tax free payment = 360*30
= $10,800
Therefore, The taxable amount is $0
Answer:
yeah it will be worse than ever
Explanation:
in both cases
Answer:
d
Explanation:
In this scenario it seems that Jenny is being a persuasive ad viewer and a critical judge of the product. This can be said because she is basing her judgement on the fact that the ad features a famous marathon runner, even though the ad is specifically designed to persuade the viewer to buy the product by using these famous athletes. And just from the athlete she is judging that the product is good and being persuaded into buying it.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
