One of the reasons people destroy or get rid of what they don't understand is the fear of the unknown. This fear is deeply anchored on self-preservation.
<h3>Examples of people getting rid of what they don't understand</h3>
<em>One key example of how this is practiced is in the relationship between man and animals</em>. People who are afraid that a certain kind of animal might hurt them are more likely to support hunting or killing such an animal.
<em>The other example is in relation to people. </em>Over the history of mankind, man has helped to destroy one another because of the fear of self-preservation. A fake document called Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which alleged that the Jews had a plan to take over the world triggered the Holocaust.
<h3>The danger of the mindset above</h3>
The irony is that many times, due to ignorance, a person or a group of people may do away with the very thing that can preserve or better their life.
- See the link below for related concepts to Self-preservation:
brainly.com/question/21601257
- The link below speaks to how animals help the entire ecosystem:
brainly.com/question/842527
- the link below speaks to how much Jew has contributed to mankind:
brainly.com/question/7665971
In "Mending Wall", by Robert Frost, the person who questions the necessity of the fence is the narrator. The narrator is not sure whether to mend the fence or not, but his neighbor repeats his father's words and traditions 'Good fences make good neighbors'. He thinks that mending the wall is being practical and doesn't want to hear the narrator's opinion against its utility.
Answer:
just be yourself and write people come to you.
be friendly and kind to everyone no matter who they are or how they treat you.
it's ok not to have best friend or make friends write away , speak with various people.
joint clubs/ extracurricular activities or go to social event to meet people.
make me brainliest
Answer:Ok i will help you here are some reasons why
Explanation:The death penalty is irreversible. Absolute judgments may lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit. Texas man Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in Texas in 2004 for allegedly setting a fire that killed his three daughters. Following his execution, further evidence revealed that Willingham did not set the fire that caused their deaths. But it came too late.There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison term. In fact, evidence reveals the opposite.
Since abolishing the death penalty in 1976, Canada’s murder rate has steadily declined and as of 2016 was at its lowest since 1966.The 2006 execution of Angel Nieves Diaz, by a so-called ‘humane’ lethal injection, took 34 minutes and required two doses. Doctors have said that it is likely Diaz’ death was painful.
Other brutal methods of execution used around the world include hanging, shooting and beheading. The nature of these deaths only continues to perpetuate the cycle of violence and may not alleviate the pain already suffered by the victims’ family.Executions are often undertaken in an extremely public manner, with public hangings in Iran or live broadcasts of lethal injections in the US. According to UN human rights experts, executions in public serve no legitimate purpose and only increase the cruel, inhuman and degrading nature of this punishment.
“All executions violate the right to life. Those carried out publicly are a gross affront to human dignity which cannot be tolerated,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa.In 2017 two countries – Guinea and Mongolia – abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
Today, 106 countries (the majority of the world’s states) have turned their backs on the death penalty for good.Those that continue to execute are a tiny minority standing against a wave of opposition.
There are countless arguments for and against the death penalty. In an imperfect world where we can never be sure we have ever got the “worst of the worst” is it ever justified to take a life?
Answer:
Here is the answer of the given question above.
Based on the poem "Apostrophe to Man" by Edna St. Vincent Millay, the writer used negative words all throughout her poem which expresses a strongly negative connotation in it. One word that is being used throughout the poem is the word "detestable". Also, she uses the word "breed" which generally applies to animals, not humans, reinforcing our bestiality. Other words include "bombing", "bewildered" and "distracted". Hope this answer helps.
Explanation:
