Answer:
The "CIVILIZING MISSION" argument
Explanation:
Colonialism is a practice of domination, which involves the subjugation of one people to another. One of the difficulties in defining colonialism is that it is hard to distinguish it from imperialism. Frequently the two concepts are treated as synonyms. Like colonialism, imperialism also involves political and economic control over a dependent territory. The etymology of the two terms, however, provides some clues about how they differ. The term colony comes from the Latin word colonus, meaning farmer. This root reminds us that the practice of colonialism usually involved the transfer of population to a new territory, where the arrivals lived as permanent settlers while maintaining political allegiance to their country of origin. Imperialism, on the other hand, comes from the Latin term imperium, meaning to command. Thus, the term imperialism draws attention to the way that one country exercises power over another, whether through settlement, sovereignty, or indirect mechanisms of control.
The legitimacy of colonialism has been a longstanding concern for political and moral philosophers in the Western tradition. At least since the Crusades and the conquest of the Americas, political theorists have struggled with the difficulty of reconciling ideas about justice and natural law with the practice of European sovereignty over non-Western peoples. In the nineteenth century, the tension between liberal thought and colonial practice became particularly acute, as dominion of Europe over the rest of the world reached its zenith. Ironically, in the same period when most political philosophers began to defend the principles of universalism and equality, the same individuals still defended the legitimacy of colonialism and imperialism. One way of reconciling those apparently opposed principles was the argument known as the “civilizing mission,” which suggested that a temporary period of political dependence or tutelage was necessary in order for “uncivilized” societies to advance to the point where they were capable of sustaining liberal institutions and self-government.
Answer:
The California Gold Rush of 1849-1855 radically transformed California, the
United States and the world. The influx of gold resulted in the expansion of
manufacturing and the service industries, as many entrepreneurial
newcomers took advantage of the demand for mining materials, lumber,
clothing and transportation.
Hope this helps LOVE
aj
<em>B. 21st Amendment.</em>
Explanation:
The 18th Amendment banned the production, sale, and distribution of liquor. The 21st Amendment repealed the 18th Amendment and made the production, sale, and distribution of liquor legal again.
The 18th Amendment banned alcohol and many people had mixed feelings about it. The temperance movement was essentially against alcohol, wanting it to be banned and prohibited. Many of the people in the temperance movement were women, some of them being victims of domestic violence which they would say was brought on by alcohol.
The banning of alcohol didn't stop a lot of people from obtaining it. Many people would make it from home illegally, or smuggle it in from other countries. Sometimes the police would become corrupt, taking bribes because of liquor. The 18th Amendment proved to be pretty ineffective, many local governments barely taking action to enforce it. Eventually, the 21st Amendment would be ratified, getting rid of the ban on alcohol.
B because it gives women the <span>"Equality of rights under the law {that] shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex" but never ratified</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C. Developing Catholic schools in cities, working in low-wage, unskilled jobs, living in poverty in city slums"<span> This shows how immigrants resisted the “Americanization Movement”</span>
