Well what i got was 79.3 by finding the average by adding it all together then divided it by how many numbers
the larger the sample the more accurate the prediction
so since Tim looked at a larger quantity of coins his would be more accurate
10/9 can be rewritten as 1 1/9, so it's closest to 1. 2/15 is really small, so close to 0.
Since the 4 is underlined in 6.5<u>4</u> it means it is in the hundredths place so the value would be 0.04.
