1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wlad13 [49]
2 years ago
6

Which of the following was not one of the main goals of the New Deal?

History
2 answers:
slega [8]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Probably C, Reinforce civil rights.

Explanation:

Scrat [10]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. Reinforce civil rights.

You might be interested in
Predict how you think the American Colonists might react to these laws and taxes that they had no say in? (give at least 2 examp
Elenna [48]

Answer: Boston Tea Party and the Boston Massacre

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Fast please<br> How did the Cold War effect us today?
Brut [27]

Answer:

The cold war effect us today//

Explanation:

World War II led to the massive mobilisation of all the people and resources nations could bring to bear. This was total war on a global scale, producing a new sense among nations that their fates were interconnected. New technologies of war, such as heavy bombers and long-range missiles like the V-2 rocket, reduced distances of time and space. In recognition of this new state of affairs, in 1942 the US Army chief of staff, George Marshall, sent identical 50-inch, 750-pound globes to British prime minister Winston Churchill and US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt as Christmas presents.

The sheer scale of the war and the complex administrative and strategic systems required to manage these global operations led to, during the Cold War that followed, a growing interdependency of a network of institutions, attitudes and ways of working.

Fuelled by the development of satellites and intercontinental nuclear missiles that further shrank the size of the planet, the Cold War redrew geopolitical notions of time, space and scale. Huge nuclear arsenals made it necessary to consider both the instantaneous and the endless: the decisive moment when mutually assured destruction is potentially set in motion, the frozen stalemate of the superpower stand-off, and the long catastrophe of a post-nuclear future.

The power of an individual decision was now outrageously amplified – the finger on the nuclear button – yet, at the same time, radically diminished in the face of unfathomable forces, in which human agency seemed to have been ceded to computers and weapons systems. The world had become too complex and too dangerous: systems were at once the threat and the solution.

It’s all about planning. x-ray_delta_one, CC BY-SA

The response

During the second half of the 20th century, many fields of enquiry from anthropology, political theory and analytical philosophy to art, music and literature were influenced by the explosion in interdisciplinary thinking that emerged from developments in cybernetics and its relationship with Cold War military research and development.

The practice of engaging with the connections and interactions between disparate elements of a problem or entity conceived as a system, and between such systems, is now commonplace in areas such as corporate strategy, town planning and environmental policy.

The pervasiveness of a systems approach also influenced the arts. The so-called systems novel, associated with writers such as Thomas Pynchon, Don DeLillo and David Foster Wallace, attempts to grasp the complex interconnectedness of society, and often the effects of technology and progress upon it. Through the 1960s and 1970s, in the radical architecture and design of the likes of Buckminster Fuller or the Archigram group, through minimalist and electronic music, and in conceptual art and emergent electronic media, the possibilities and implications of an increasingly computerised, information-driven society began to determine the form and content of cultural work.

Systems thinking offered a means of conceptualising and understanding a world that had grown hugely more complex and dangerous. Nuclear weapons demanded radical new ways of thinking about time, scale, power, death, responsibility and, most of all, control – control of technology, people, information and ideas.

The present

We are now accustomed to thinking about the current moment in global terms – globalisation, global warming, global communications, global security. Mobile phones and laptops connect us to a vast global network so we can upload and download data – data that promises to broaden our connections even as it flattens our identity into a trickle of binary code to be tracked, traded, sorted and stored.

Everyday life is firewalled and password-protected. We move under a canopy of invisible cameras and sensors, where our personal details and likenesses, our associations, preferences and transactions lie waiting to be called upon – by friends, strangers, employers or snoops. And so what? We all do it – we are already conscripted. We have already become agents, checking up on people by rifling through social media accounts or poking around on Street View.

Faced with the unfathomable complexity of world events, or climate science, or the effects of the technology that delivers updates on such matters to us in an instant, information is both the source of our dilemma and a refuge from it.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role did the British play in the success of the Monroe Doctrine in the early half of the 19th century?
Vaselesa [24]
Well, the British was the cause of James Monroe passing the Monroe Doctrine. They settled in territory they weren't permitted and then the Monroe Doctrine was passed in effect of European settlement aka the British. They then agreed to not settle and in return, their foreign affairs was left to be.
7 0
3 years ago
Describe the way some viking weapons were decorated
White raven [17]
Not really decorated in that sense as making them look "good" i guess, but they were mostly leather bound and covered in tar to help preserve the wood.

Hope this Helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Which ancient civilization was ruled by many dynasties, including the Song and Ming, and eventually developed the idea of the dy
castortr0y [4]
Dynastic cycle (traditional Chinese: 朝代循環; simplified Chinese: 朝代循环; pinyin: Cháodài Xúnhuán) is an important political theory in the Chinese history. According to this theory, each dynasty in Chinese history, rises to a political, cultural, and economic peak and then, because of moral corruption, declines, loses the Mandate of Heaven, and falls, only to be replaced by a new dynasty. The cycle then repeats under a surface pattern of repetitive motifs.[1]

It sees a continuity in Chinese history from early times to the present by looking at the succession of empires or dynasties, implying that there is little basic development or change in social or economic structures.[2] John K. Fairbank expressed the doubts of many historians when he wrote that "the concept of the dynastic cycle... has been a major block to the understanding of the fundamental dynamics of Chinese history."[3]
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What sparked the sepoy rebellion
    12·2 answers
  • What were the two major resources traded in Ghana?
    7·2 answers
  • Production increases do not affect the quantity supplied of an item. True or False
    15·1 answer
  • How many country’s consider themselves a part of the British commonwealth
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me with this
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the Democratic Party emerge?
    5·2 answers
  • What physical evidence is there in Spain today of the influence of the Roman and Moor empires?
    14·1 answer
  • People in china are monotheistic or polytheistic? ​
    8·1 answer
  • 25 points!
    6·1 answer
  • How did the feudal system protect a lord as well as his peasents
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!