Answer:
Brand D has the highest return rate so they should eliminate that one.
Step-by-step explanation:
brand A - .0481
brand B - .0307
Brand C - .0410
Brand D - .0788
Answer:
6. 4.5×10⁴
7. 4.2×10^-3
8. 9.5×10^9
9. 1.3×10^-3
10. 3×10²
Step-by-step explanation:
start counting just after the dot . hope it helps
Divide the amount of the tax by the cost of the item:
32.80 / 410 = 0.08
Multiply by 100:
0.08 x 100 = 8%
Answer: 8%
Answer:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
A type I error occurs when you reject the null hypothesis when it is true. In this situation, a type I error occurs when you conclude on possible child neglect or abuse and place the child in protective custody
A type II error occurs when you accept the null hypothesis when it is false. In this instance, a type II error occurs when you conclude on no possible child abuse or neglect when there is and fail to remove the child from the home.
In this case, the type II error is the more serious error. Failure to remove the child when there is possible child abuse or neglect will lead to more detrimental effect. Although, the type I error is also serious, it is not so detrimental as the type II error.
