Considering the p-value of 0.6, the decision is that we do not reject the null hypothesis.
<h3>What are the hypothesis tested?</h3>
At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportions are equal, that is:
At the alternative hypothesis, we test if they are different, that is:
<h3>What is the decision rule?</h3>
- If the p-value is greater than the significance level, we do not reject the null hypothesis.
- If the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis.
In this problem, the significance level is of 0.1, while the p-value is of 0.6, hence the correct decision for the test is to not reject the null hypothesis.
More can be learned about p-values and hypothesis tests at brainly.com/question/16313918
Answer:
Add lotion twice a day. Recomend Gold bond
Explanation:
Considering the situation described above, Ahmet’s reaction to the toy best demonstrates the process of <u>generalization</u>.
<h3>The definition of generalization of reaction</h3>
Generalization of reaction is a term used to describe the propensity to react similarly to different but related stimuli.
<h3>Generalization concept in this situation</h3>
Given that Ahmet is allergic to dogs and, at the same time, has an allergic reaction to a stuffed toy dog, this is a form of <u>generalization</u>.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>generalization</u>."
Learn more about <u>generalization</u> reaction here: brainly.com/question/16821211