Answer:
try A
Explanation:
it makes more since sorry if it doesnt help
Answer:
World War I was the first time since the Berlin Conference of 1884 that European colonial powers fought each other on a large scale, and not over issues related to their respective colonies.
This situation implied a general weakening of the European powers, which neglected the affairs of their colonies to dedicate their efforts to solve the war and the well-being of their nations. Therefore, this caused the colonial powers to lose power in Africa, thus starting anti-colonial movements that deepened after the Second World War. In addition, in the war itself, many countries, such as Germany, lost their colonies to other nations, which caused the inhabitants of the colonies themselves to lose a sense of belonging to their colonizers.
Answer:
I guess the one that makes most since is D
Explanation:
?????? hope it helps
Answer:
No, the United States should not declare war.
Explanation:
If there was no reason to attack the U.S, then there is no reason to fight back. We shouldn't waste precious materials and money on something that could disappear just as soon as it started. If, and only if, they persist then we do have the right to defend ourselves. But the U.S should try to find the reason that they wanted to attack us for. There is no action without a reason. Then we could come to a conclusion on the subject.
This is only my opinion, so please don't think that your answer, or thinking should have to change.
Grenville's policies antagonized northern merchant, settlers in the northern back-country, southern planters, urban professionals, small farmers, workers in towns as his policies led to people being mad and turning hostile about being taxed heavily.
George Grenvillea was English politician whose policy of taxing the American colonies, initiated by his Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act of 1765, started the train of events leading to the American Revolution.