Consider the set {1, 2, 3, 4, ..., m} where m is some natural number, i.e. a positive whole number.
Now let's say we wanted to add everything in that set.
What we can do is write out the terms
1, 2, 3, 4, ..., m
then just underneath, we write the reverse of that set
m, ..., 4, 3, 2, 1
Here's an example of what I mean. I'll use m = 7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd5a9/bd5a9a2ed93e975133fcd2f3db400d860a163376" alt="\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \cline{1-7}1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7\\\cline{1-7}7 & 6 & 5 & 4 & 3 & 2 & 1\\\cline{1-7}\end{array}"
For each column, add straight down
The third row will be nothing but 8's
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f30fc/f30fc9889b8c7933cb38177fc37b4afa550f55cf" alt="\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \cline{1-7}1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7\\\cline{1-7}7 & 6 & 5 & 4 & 3 & 2 & 1\\\cline{1-7}8 & 8 & 8 & 8 & 8 & 8 & 8\\\cline{1-7}\end{array}"
We can see there are seven copies of '8' being added here, so the sum of all the numbers in the set {1,2,3,4,5,6,7} is 8*7 = 56. But wait, we double-counted each item when we formed the second row. So we must divide by 2 to fix the double-counting error.
Therefore, 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 = 56/2 = 28 instead.
-----------------------------
That previous example showed that adding from 1 to 7 means we have 7 copies of (1+7). In other words, 7 copies of 8 being added.
We could write that as 7(1+7)
Then divide that by 2 to fix the double-counting error.
We have 7(1+7)/2
Now imagine that we applied all of what was mentioned to the set {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}. Instead of 7's, we use 8's this time to get 8(1+8)/2
Then we can extend it out to the set {1,2,3,4,..., m} and we get the formula m(1+m)/2
We have m copies of (1+m) being added; hence the m(1+m). Don't forget to divide by 2 to fix the double-counting error.
-----------------------------
The key takeaway here is that summing 1+2+3+4+...+m gets us m(1+m)/2
In this case, m = 2n because we want the first 2n natural numbers.
Therefore,
m(1+m)/2
2n(1+2n)/2
n(1+2n)
n(2n+1)
represents the sum 1+2+3+...+n+...+2n
-----------------------------
Try out a value like n = 5 to find that 2n = 2*5 = 10, and,
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 = 55
also
n(2n+1) = 5(2*5+1) = 5*(11) = 55
Showing that the formula works for n = 5. I'll let you try other values of n.