The most exciting part
Normally the part where you start squealing
plz amr brainliest plz
Answer:
a. sloths
b. I
c. owl; elephant
d. Laurie; Jaannie
Explanation:
A simple subject is a single noun or pronoun connected to a verb.
a. <em>Three-toed sloths</em> is a complete subject. Modifiers are not part of a simple subject. Therefore, sloths is the simple subect in A.
c. d. These sentences contain <em>multiple</em> simple subjects.
Owl is a simple subject in C, and elephant is also a simple subject in C. The multiple articles <em>the</em> are not included in simple subjects.
Laurie is a simple subject in D, and Jaannie is also a simple subject in D.
Print:
Can be eligible in certain situations
(Like the material the words are printed on might be damaged, or it is handwritten and eligible)
Can be passed on physically to others, like throwing notes at each other in class or sending letters.
When the material is hand written and printed, sometimes you can feel the writer’s emotions in their handwriting like pressure in each letter or the size and such.
Non-print
More accurate since the material is typed up, there’s spelling checks and such tools.
Can be sent to a large amount of people in a short amount of time, like shared as a pdf or sent through email.
Words can be zoomed in if difficult to read.
Similarities
Whether printed or not, if the content of the material itself is the same the same message can be delivered to readers.
Although different methods, can be shared/sent to others.
Answer:
These word choices highlight the tone of irony.
Explanation:
The question above is about the poem "War is Kind" written by Stephen Crane. The entire poem has a strong tone of verbal irony, which can first be found in the poem speaker's statements about why women should not cry because the men they love were killed in war, because war is a good and benevolent thing. This characteristic of war contains strong irony, since nothing good and benevolent would kill anyone.
Verbal irony is reinforced by the use of contradictory ideas like those found in the question above, where the author mixes the characteristics that war promoters impose on themselves and the real characteristics among them.
