Answer:
deduction = 0 in 2015
Deduction = $ 15000 in 2016
balance = $20000
it is carried forward to the year 2017
Explanation:
given data
partnership interest = $40,000
partnership loss = $35,000
partnership income = $15,000
to find out
How much may Kay deduct in 2015 and 2016
solution
we can say that Loss is adjust or deduct against Profit of Kay when it makes profit during a year
so as that Kay make loss in 2015 and no profits during that year to adjust those loses against
so deduction = 0 in 2015
but
in 2016
Kay income = $ 15000
Kay adjust loss of previous year against this income to extent of income available
so Deduction = $ 15000 in 2016
and after that
here balance after deducting the passive loss is
balance = $35000 - $15000
balance = $20000
it is carried forward to the year 2017
Answer:
c. III only
Explanation:
The correct option is - c. III only
Reason -
III option is correct because The trade-off theory states that there is an optimal level of debt for firms, given the benefits of tax shields and the costs of financial distress
The formula for the receivables turnover ratio is net credit sales divided by average accounts receivable.
<h3>What is receivable turnover ratio?</h3>
The receivable turnover ratio is what measure the number of times over a given period that a company collects its average account.
It is the number of times per year that a business collects its average accounts receivable.
Hence, the formula for the receivables turnover ratio is net credit sales divided by average accounts receivable.
Learn more about receivables turnover ratio here : brainly.com/question/24849094
#SPJ1
The main reason is that they thought they could not only successfully battle international rivals, but could gain on weaker domestic competitors that failed to do so. This subject is related to mercantilism and one of the characteristics is the u<span>se of high import barriers and export subsidies. </span>
Answer:
fall
Explanation:
The situation above can be best explained by using the "Liquidity Preference Theory." According to the theory when money supply increases (as in the situation above), the interest rate falls. So, this means that many people will be more willing to invest, thereby resulting to a higher income. On the contrary, if the money supply decreases, the interest rate rises. This may temporarily increase the employment condition, however, it can lead to inflation in the long-run.
So, this explains the answer.