What do you think Anielski means by the phrase

What are some of the drawbacks from 2007 to 2009 you have encountered in your research for this discussion, why companies showed

Firdavs [7]

Answer:

Officially, the Great Recession lasted between December 2007 and June 2009, but it certainly seemed longer.

The economy crushed property and stock markets, destroyed $18.9 trillion of household wealth and destroyed over eight million jobs.

Explanation:

In December 2007, the Great Recession came to an end in June 2009, making the Great Recession the longest since World War II. The Great Recession was extremely extreme in a number of ways. Actual GDP decreased by 4.3% in 2009Q2, the biggest decline in the post-war era (based on the data of October 2013), as from its peak in 2007 Qu4. The figure was 4.3%. In December 2007, the unemployment rate was 5%, rising to 9.5% in June 2009 and a high of 10% in October 2009.

Simultaneously, the financial consequences of the Great Recession had outsized: the average home prices decreased by about 30 percent from the middle of 2006 to mid-2009, while the S&P 500 index decreased by 57 percent from its high in October 2007. Net values for US households and non-profit organizations dropped to $55 trillion in 2009, from a high of approximately $69 trillion in 2007.

7 0

3 years ago

Billy Mitchell is the head cashier for a clothing store that specializes in men’s silk suits. After losing big at the local dog

VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer: Fictitious refunds

Explanation:

A fictitious refund scheme, occurs when a fraudster processes a transaction to look as if a customer was returning a merchandise, even though there was no actual return. While some fraudsters create an entirely fictitious refund, other fraudsters just overstate the amount of a legitimate refund that took place and steal the excess money.

Billy Mitchell covering his gambling debts, issuing several refund credits to his personal credit card for amounts that were below the store’s review limit is an example of fictitious refund scheme.

4 0

3 years ago

problem 08-07 (algo) you are the manager of a monopolistically competitive firm, and your demand and cost functions are estimate

Ad libitum [116K]

Demand function: Q = 48 - 2P

a) 2P = 48 - Q

Therefore the inverse Demand function is

P = 24 - Q/2

b) P = 24 - Q/2

Total Revenue = PQ = (24 - Q/2)*Q

TR = 24Q - Q2/2

MR = differentiating TR with respect to Q

MR = 24 - Q

We know a firm will maximize profit at MR = MC

TC = 6 + 3Q + Q2

MC = 3 + 2Q

Putting MR = MC, we have

24 - Q = 3 + 2Q

24 - 3 = 2Q + Q

21 = 3Q

Q = 21/3 = 7

Q = 7

Putting the value of Q in the equation P = 24 - Q/2

P = 24 - 7/2

P = 24 - 3.5

P = 20.5

Therefore the profit-maximizing output is 7 and the price is $20.5

c) TR = PQ = 20.5*7 = $143.5

TC = 6 + 3Q + Q2 = 6 + 3*7 + 7*7 = 6 + 21 + 49 = $76

Profit = TR - TC = 143.5 - 76 = $67.5

Therefore the firm's maximum profit is $67.5

d) a) entry will occur until profits are zero

In the long run, more and more firms will enter the market and the economic profit will be zero in the long run.

In economics, a Demand function is a graph depicting the connection between the price of a sure commodity and the amount of that commodity that is demanded at that fee. call for curves may be used both for the price-amount courting for a person client, or for all purchasers in a selected marketplace.

Learn more about the Demand function here: brainly.com/question/24384825

#SPJ4

5 0

1 year ago

Edmund stench consumes two commodities, namely garbage and punk rock video cassettes. he doesn't actually eat the former but kee

katrin2010 [14]

<span>There is no clearly defined question and grammatical errors are in the text above. That said, the text begs the question why does Edmund consume cassettes? The answer is that the cassettes attract billy goats and the goats eat the garbage. Edmund can earn a living as long as each $6 cassette attracts enough of the goats to consume 3 garbage sacks. To be profitable, one cassette must attract enough goats to consume 4 sacks of garbage.</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Own price increases are associated with decreases in quantity demanded, ceteris paribus. These decreases in quantity demanded ar

andrew11 [14]

Answer:

Income effect

Explanation:

Own price increases are associated with decreases in quantity demanded, ceteris paribus. These decreases in quantity demanded are composed of two effects, the substitution effect and the<u> Income effect.</u>

We know as per the law of demand, price increases lead to decrease in the quantity demanded if factor remain constant.

Quantity demanded has effect of two other major factors:

Subtitution effect.
Income effect.

Subtitution effect: It is the price of subtitution goods & services also lead to increase and decrease of demand for any particular goods.

Example: Price of tea and coffee.

Income effect: It is the income of consumer that effect the demand of any goods & sevices, as with the increase in income of consumer, their demand for inferior goods decreases and demand for branded goods increases.

Example: Non branded clothes and branded clothes.

3 0

3 years ago