Answer:
$3,762
Explanation:
The computation is as seen below
Total cost when the production is 9,900 units
Direct materials $8,316
Direct labor $11,187
Variable overhead $12,474
Total $31,977
But,
Their new cost on supplier offer is
= $2.85 × 9,900 units
= $28,215
In the case when the order is accepted, the net income would increase by
= $31,977 - $28,215
= $3,762
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": To a large extent, the decision to dissolve a firm through liquidation versus keeping it alive through reorganization depends on a determination of the value of the firm if it is rehabilitated versus the value of its assets if they are sold off individually.
Explanation:
Liquidation refers to the termination of an enterprise and the transfer of its properties to the creditor or business owners. The liquidation most frequently happens in the context of a bankruptcy. A bankruptcy trustee must sell the company properties to the creditors and split the proceeds.
<em>The decision of keeping a business against liquidating it will depend on the comparison between the value of continuing operating which relies on the current value the firm has in the market against the value of the individual assets the firm has. Whichever greater will determine if the business will remain open or if it will be closed.</em>
Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed
Answer:
Bad debt expense $11,320 ($283,000 × 4%)
To Allowance for doubtful debts $11,320
(being the bad debt expense is recorded)
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Bad debt expense $11,320 ($283,000 × 4%)
To Allowance for doubtful debts $11,320
(being the bad debt expense is recorded)
For recording this given transaction, we debited the bad debt expense as it increases the expenses account and at the same time it decreases the account receivable so the allowance would be credited so that the proper posting could be done
Answer:
Fuel is an expense and the fact that it was not paid off immediately means that it is an amount owed to Western Oil thereby making it an Accounts Payable.
Journal entry is:
Date Account title and Description Debit Credit
Fuel Expense $4,360
Accounts Payable $4,360
