All categories

2 years ago

When investors doubt the creditworthiness of a borrower what should happen to the price?.

Business

2 answers:

yanalaym [24]2 years ago

5 0

When investors doubt the creditworthiness of a borrower what should happen to the price?.

Alchen [17]2 years ago

5 0

Answer: Prices go down

Explanation:If interest rates rise above 8% and if the investor decides to sell it bond's price will fall as it makes bond unattractive as compare to other higher interest paying bonds/ instruments

You might be interested in

Mary, Ann, and Beth are partners. Their capital balances are, ; ; and , respectively. As per the partnership agreement, Mar

77julia77 [94]

Complete Question:

Mary, Ann, and Beth are partners. Their capital balances are $23,000, $41,000 and $30,000 respectively As per the partnership agreement Mary receives a profit share of 2/9, Ann has 4/9, and Beth has 39 Beth withdraws from the partnership by receiving $23.000 What will be the impact of this transaction on the journal entries?

A. Cash will be debited for $30,000

B. Mary. Capital will be debited for S 7,000

C. Ann, capital will be credited for $7,000

D. Beth, Capital will be debited for $30,000

Answer:

D. Beth, Capital will be debited for $30,000

Explanation:

The entry would be reduction in capital by $30,000 because his investment is sold for $23,000 and the remainder $7,000 would be profit for two remaining partners and would be shared with their respective ownership.

The entry is as under:

Dr Beth Capital Account $30,000

Cr Mary Capital A/c $2,333 (1/3) of $7,000

Cr Ann Capital A/c $4,667 (1/3) of $7,000

Cr Cash Account $23,000

Hence the option D is correct here.

Option A is incorrect because cash wasn't debited with.

Option B is incorrect because Mary capital wasn't debited, it was credited.

Option C is also incorrect because Ann's capital was credited but with (2/3) share.

5 0

3 years ago

Which of these types of business law deals with trademark issues

Softa [21]

Its has to be B, it gotta be B

4 0

3 years ago

In considering the BP Oil Spill, what circumstances would ethically justify a government or private company in restricting infor

Zanzabum

Answer with its Explanation:

There must be a clear information sharing policy of an organization like BP Oil Spill to restrict the inappropriate operations and reduce the negligence of the organizations so that they might not effect the future and present generation. Its evident that in technologically advanced era, the flow of information is just one internet search away. So the restricting of information is mostly impossible and that the restricting of information like Oil Spill can be far much dangerous for both land and marine life. So here, clear policy of defining the type of information to be conveyed to general public would be very useful. It is also one of the best practice that sustainability stresses upon which says that the operations that undermine or compromises the needs of the future generations must be abandoned.

There must also be a recovery policy for the ecosystem that we had damaged and thanks to social entrepreneurs who are doing this job much better than most of the multinational organizations.

There are also situations where the restricting the information is allowed and includes the following situations that permits the restriction of information:

If the information is not accurate then it is advice that the organization must wait until the situation is crystal clear to be interpreted and disclosed to the general public.
If the provision of information can lead to security threats then it must be kept confidential till the time the security threat has been eliminated.
If the flow of information leads to the increase in the chaos and stress among the people then it must be retained during a disaster.
If the information results in increase in protests and affects the normal life of general public then it must be restricted for general public.
If an information promotes war among the nations then it must be restricted.
If the information that is for small time interval and has potential harmful outcomes due to disclosure of information then it must be retained by the organization.

The above mention points make it clear that the information can only be disclosed if the sensitivity of the matter is lost with time. The disclosure is compulsory because now it is the ethical requirement of the company to disclose the information. The disclosure of information must include the reasons that explains the issue and its root causes. Furthermore, it must also address the reason behind the retention of information and how it was in the best interest of the nation.

In the time environmental disaster, every single person on earth has a moral duty to help each other to assist in recovery of the damage from the environmental damage. Likewise the organizations are playing their part during current pandemic to help the world recover from the losses they had born due to virus affecting the operations of all the companies and human beings.

Following are the situations in which the organizations must play their role in the time of environmental disaster:

If the environmental disaster is of potential magnitude that the ethical values imposes the duty to act then the company must play its role.

The company has to act if the country has limited resources to take action and can not control the situation without the assistance of the companies.

If the disaster has endanger the Biotic environment then the companies must do more.
If the impact on the environment is continuously growing with time and if the companies are not taking right actions then it is possible that in the near future the harm to the society will be large and symptoms will become prominent as well.
If the environment disaster is large enough that it will spoil the reputation of the industry and as result results in harm to numerous stakeholders of the industry or if the whole of the industry would be blamed for negligence.

7 0

3 years ago

Describe 2 reasons why many Midwest farmers and ranchers are welcoming wind farms and becoming developers.

Igoryamba

Explanation:

*Free fuel

*One of the cleanest form of energy

*Advance of technology

*Reduce our dependence of fossil fuel

*Doesn't disrupt farmland operations

8 0

2 years ago

Hal Gore won a $2.1 million prize for special contributions to environmental research. This prize is awarded for public achievem

ioda

Answer:

1.53 Million

Explanation:

The reason is that the Environment Protection Agency is a qualified organization and donations made to qualified organization are allowable expense under the US tax rules, so the gross income will include a net amount which is the actual amount left for Hal Gore and which is $1.53 million ($2.1 m - 0.57).

8 0

4 years ago